CHAPTER 85 —DISTRICT COURTS; JURISDICTION
Amendments
1994—
1990—
1988—
1986—
1984—
1980—
1978—
1976—
1970—
1966—
1962—
1958—
1953—Act Aug. 15, 1953, ch. 505, §3,
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
Procedure, generally, in district courts, see Appendix to this title.
Jurisdictional grounds, statement required in claim for relief, see rule 8.
Parties, see rules 17 to 25.
Process and service, see rules 4 and 5.
Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
Procedure, generally, in district courts, see Title 18, Appendix, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.
Cross References
Admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, see
Amendment of pleadings to show jurisdiction, see
Costs on dismissal for lack of jurisdiction, see
Criminal jurisdiction of district courts, see
Criminal procedure, see
District of Columbia district court, additional jurisdiction, see D.C. Code §11–501.
Guam, jurisdiction of district court, see
Immigration, jurisdiction of district courts, see
Jurisdiction in suits to recover share of expenses against handlers of agricultural commodities regardless of amount in controversy, see
Jurisdiction of district courts in particular matters, see table in reviser's note for
Naturalization, judicial review by district courts of denial of application, see
Process, see
Removal of cases from state courts, see
Virgin Islands, jurisdiction of district court, see
§1330. Actions against foreign states
(a) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction without regard to amount in controversy of any nonjury civil action against a foreign state as defined in
(b) Personal jurisdiction over a foreign state shall exist as to every claim for relief over which the district courts have jurisdiction under subsection (a) where service has been made under
(c) For purposes of subsection (b), an appearance by a foreign state does not confer personal jurisdiction with respect to any claim for relief not arising out of any transaction or occurrence enumerated in
(Added
Effective Date
Section effective 90 days after Oct. 21, 1976, see section 8 of
§1331. Federal question
The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646,
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §41(1) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §24, par. 1,
Jurisdiction of federal questions arising under other sections of this chapter is not dependent upon the amount in controversy. (See annotations under former
Words "wherein the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $3,000, exclusive of interest and costs," were added to conform to rulings of the Supreme Court. See construction of provision relating to jurisdictional amount requirement in cases involving a Federal question in United States v. Sayward, 16 S.Ct. 371, 160 U.S. 493, 40 L.Ed. 508; Fishback v. Western Union Tel. Co., 16 S.Ct. 506, 161 U.S. 96, 40 L.Ed. 630; and Halt v. Indiana Manufacturing Co., 1900, 20 S.Ct. 272, 176 U.S. 68, 44 L.Ed. 374.
Words "all civil actions" were substituted for "all suits of a civil nature, at common law or in equity" to conform with Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Words "or treaties" were substituted for "or treaties made, or which shall be made under their authority," for purposes of brevity.
The remaining provisions of
Changes were made in arrangement and phraseology.
Amendments
1980—
1976—Subsec. (a).
1958—
Effective Date of 1980 Amendment; Applicability
Section 4 of
Effective Date of 1958 Amendment
Section 3 of
Cross References
Controversies involving pollution of waters, jurisdiction of actions by States, see
Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes, exclusive jurisdiction of district courts over actions and proceedings for enforcement of arbitration awards under the Convention, regardless of amount in controversy, see
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as party, see
Federal reserve bank as party, see
International Finance Corporation as party, see
International or foreign banking transactions, see
Reclamation projects, compensation for rights-of-way, see
Section Referred to in Other Sections
This section is referred to in
§1332. Diversity of citizenship; amount in controversy; costs
(a) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $50,000, exclusive of interest and costs, and is between—
(1) citizens of different States;
(2) citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state;
(3) citizens of different States and in which citizens or subjects of a foreign state are additional parties; and
(4) a foreign state, defined in
For the purposes of this section, section 1335, and section 1441, an alien admitted to the United States for permanent residence shall be deemed a citizen of the State in which such alien is domiciled.
(b) Except when express provision therefor is otherwise made in a statute of the United States, where the plaintiff who files the case originally in the Federal courts is finally adjudged to be entitled to recover less than the sum or value of $50,000, computed without regard to any setoff or counterclaim to which the defendant may be adjudged to be entitled, and exclusive of interest and costs, the district court may deny costs to the plaintiff and, in addition, may impose costs on the plaintiff.
(c) For the purposes of this section and
(1) a corporation shall be deemed to be a citizen of any State by which it has been incorporated and of the State where it has its principal place of business, except that in any direct action against the insurer of a policy or contract of liability insurance, whether incorporated or unincorporated, to which action the insured is not joined as a party-defendant, such insurer shall be deemed a citizen of the State of which the insured is a citizen, as well as of any State by which the insurer has been incorporated and of the State where it has its principal place of business; and
(2) the legal representative of the estate of a decedent shall be deemed to be a citizen only of the same State as the decedent, and the legal representative of an infant or incompetent shall be deemed to be a citizen only of the same State as the infant or incompetent.
(d) The word "States", as used in this section, includes the Territories, the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646,
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §41(1) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §24, par. 1,
Other provisions of
Jurisdiction conferred by other sections of this chapter, except section 1335, is not dependent upon diversity of citizenship. (See annotations under former
Words "all civil actions" were substituted for "all suits of a civil nature, at common law or in equity" in order to conform to Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Words "or citizens of the District of Columbia, Territory of Hawaii, or Alaska, and any State or Territory" which were inserted by the amendatory act April 20, 1940, are omitted. The word "States" is defined in this section and enumeration of the references is unnecessary.
The revised section conforms with the views of Philip F. Herrick, United States Attorney, Puerto Rico, who observed that the act of April 20, 1940, permitted action between a citizen of Hawaii and of Puerto Rico, but not between a citizen of New York and Puerto Rico, in the district court.
This changes the law to insure uniformity. The 1940 amendment applied only to the provision as to controversies between "citizens of different States." The new definition in subsection (b) extends the 1940 amendment to apply to controversies between citizens of the Territories or the District of Columbia, and foreign states or citizens or subjects thereof.
The diversity of citizenship language of
This section is intended to cover all diversity of citizenship instances in civil actions in accordance with the judicial construction of the language in the original
Citizens of a State, and citizens of other States and foreign states or citizens or subjects thereof;
Citizens of a Territory or the District of Columbia, and foreign states or citizens or subjects thereof;
Citizens of different States;
Citizens of different Territories;
Citizens of a State, and citizens of Territories;
Citizens of a State or Territory, and citizens of the District of Columbia;
Citizens of a State, and foreign states or citizens or subjects thereof.
The revised section removes an uncertainty referred to in the McGarry case, supra, as to whether Congress intended to permit citizens of the Territories or the District of Columbia to sue a State or Territory itself rather than the citizens thereof. The court observed that "Congress could hardly have had such intention."
The sentence "The foregoing provisions as to the sum or value of the matter in controversy shall not be construed to apply to any of the cases mentioned in the succeeding paragraphs of this section" was omitted as unnecessary. Those paragraphs are (2)–(28) of said
Amendments
1988—Subsec. (a).
Subsec. (b).
Subsec. (c).
1976—Subsec. (a)(2).
Subsec. (a)(3).
Subsec. (a)(4).
1964—Subsec. (c).
1958—
Subsec. (a).
Subsecs. (b) to (d).
1956—Subsec. (b). Act July 26, 1956, included the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
Effective Date of 1988 Amendment
Section 201(b) of title II of
Section 202(b) of title II of
Section 203(b) of title II of
Effective Date of 1976 Amendment
Amendment by
Effective Date of 1964 Amendment
Section 2 of
Effective Date of 1958 Amendment
Amendment by
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
Defenses and objections, see rule 12, Appendix to this title.
Cross References
Controversies involving pollution of waters, jurisdiction of actions by States, see
Removal of cases from State courts, see
Venue of actions based on diversity of citizenship, see
Section Referred to in Other Sections
This section is referred to in
§1333. Admiralty, maritime and prize cases
The district courts shall have original jurisdiction, exclusive of the courts of the States, of:
(1) Any civil case of admiralty or maritime jurisdiction, saving to suitors in all cases all other remedies to which they are otherwise entitled.
(2) Any prize brought into the United States and all proceedings for the condemnation of property taken as prize.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646,
Historical and Revision Notes
1948 Act
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§41(3) and 371 (3), (4) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §§24, par. 3, 256, pars. 3, 4,
Section consolidates certain provisions of
The "saving to suitors" clause in
Provisions of
Words "libellant or petitioner" were substituted for "suitors" to describe moving party in admiralty cases.
Changes were made in phraseology.
1949 Act
This section amends
Amendments
1949—Subd. (1). Act May 24, 1949, substituted "suitors" for "libellant or petitioner".
Cross References
Admiralty and maritime jurisdiction of cases of damage or injury to persons or property, caused by a vessel, whether done or consummated on land, see
Admiralty suits against United States, jurisdiction, see
Jury trial in admiralty cases, see
Limitation of vessel owner's liability, see
Prize—
Generally, see
Jurisdiction, see
Seaman, definition of, see
§1334. Bankruptcy cases and proceedings
(a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, the district courts shall have original and exclusive jurisdiction of all cases under title 11.
(b) Notwithstanding any Act of Congress that confers exclusive jurisdiction on a court or courts other than the district courts, the district courts shall have original but not exclusive jurisdiction of all civil proceedings arising under title 11, or arising in or related to cases under title 11.
(c)(1) Nothing in this section prevents a district court in the interest of justice, or in the interest of comity with State courts or respect for State law, from abstaining from hearing a particular proceeding arising under title 11 or arising in or related to a case under title 11.
(2) Upon timely motion of a party in a proceeding based upon a State law claim or State law cause of action, related to a case under title 11 but not arising under title 11 or arising in a case under title 11, with respect to which an action could not have been commenced in a court of the United States absent jurisdiction under this section, the district court shall abstain from hearing such proceeding if an action is commenced, and can be timely adjudicated, in a State forum of appropriate jurisdiction.
(d) Any decision to abstain or not to abstain made under this subsection 1 (other than a decision not to abstain in a proceeding described in subsection (c)(2)) is not reviewable by appeal or otherwise by the court of appeals under
(e) The district court in which a case under title 11 is commenced or is pending shall have exclusive jurisdiction of all of the property, wherever located, of the debtor as of the commencement of such case, and of property of the estate.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646,
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§41(19) and 371(6) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §§24, par. 19, 256, par. 6,
Changes in phraseology were made.
Amendments
1994—Subsecs. (c)(2), (d).
Subsec. (e).
1990—Subsec. (c)(2).
1986—Subsec. (d).
1984—
1978—
Effective Date of 1994 Amendment
Amendment by
Effective Date of 1986 Amendment
Amendment by
Effective Date of 1984 Amendment
Amendment by
Jurisdiction Over and Transfer of Bankruptcy Cases and Proceedings
Section 115 of
"(a) On the date of the enactment of this Act [July 10, 1984] the appropriate district court of the United States shall have jurisdiction of—
"(1) cases, and matters and proceedings in cases, under the Bankruptcy Act [former Title 11, Bankruptcy] that are pending immediately before such date in the bankruptcy courts continued by section 404(a) of the Act of November 6, 1978 (
"(2) cases under
"(b) On the date of the enactment of this Act [July 10, 1984], there shall be transferred to the appropriate district court of the United States appeals from final judgments, orders, and decrees of the bankruptcy courts pending immediately before such date in the bankruptcy appellate panels appointed under section 405(c) of the Act of November 6, 1978 (
Section Referred to in Other Sections
This section is referred to in
1 So in original. Probably should be a reference to subsection (c). See 1994 Amendment note below.
§1335. Interpleader
(a) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action of interpleader or in the nature of interpleader filed by any person, firm, or corporation, association, or society having in his or its custody or possession money or property of the value of $500 or more, or having issued a note, bond, certificate, policy of insurance, or other instrument of value or amount of $500 or more, or providing for the delivery or payment or the loan of money or property of such amount or value, or being under any obligation written or unwritten to the amount of $500 or more, if
(1) Two or more adverse claimants, of diverse citizenship as defined in
(b) Such an action may be entertained although the titles or claims of the conflicting claimants do not have a common origin, or are not identical, but are adverse to and independent of one another.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646,
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §41(26) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §24, par. 26, as added Jan. 20, 1936, ch. 13, §1,
Words "civil action" were substituted for "suits in equity"; word "plaintiff" was substituted for "complainant"; and word "judgment" was substituted for "decree," in order to make the language of this section conform with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
The words "duly verified" following "in the nature of interpleader," near the beginning of the section, were omitted. Under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure pleadings are no longer required to be verified or accompanied by affidavit unless specially required by statute. Although verification was specially required by
Provisions of
Subsections (c) and (d) of said section 41(26) relating to issuance of injunctions constitute
Subsection (e) of such section 41(26), relating to defense in nature of interpleader and joinder of additional parties, was omitted as unnecessary, such matters being governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Changes were made in phraseology.
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
Interpleader, injunctions and deposit in court, see rules 22, 65, and 67, Appendix to this title.
Form of complaint, see Form 18, Appendix to rules.
Cross References
Actions on war risk insurance claims, see
Interpleader actions—
Process and procedure, see
Venue, see
Section Referred to in Other Sections
This section is referred to in
§1336. Interstate Commerce Commission's orders
(a) Except as otherwise provided by Act of Congress, the district courts shall have jurisdiction of any civil action to enforce, in whole or in part, any order of the Interstate Commerce Commission, and to enjoin or suspend, in whole or in part, any order of the Interstate Commerce Commission for the payment of money or the collection of fines, penalties, and forfeitures.
(b) When a district court or the United States Court of Federal Claims refers a question or issue to the Interstate Commerce Commission for determination, the court which referred the question or issue shall have exclusive jurisdiction of a civil action to enforce, enjoin, set aside, annul, or suspend, in whole or in part, any order of the Interstate Commerce Commission arising out of such referral.
(c) Any action brought under subsection (b) of this section shall be filed within 90 days from the date that the order of the Interstate Commerce Commission becomes final.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646,
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §41(27), (28) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §§24(27), (28), 207,
Words "Except as otherwise provided by enactment of Congress" were inserted because of certain similar cases of which the courts of appeals are given jurisdiction. (See, for example,
Words "any civil action" were substituted for "all cases" and "cases" in view of Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Changes were made in phraseology.
Amendments
1992—Subsec. (b).
1982—Subsec. (b).
1975—Subsec. (a).
1964—
Effective Date of 1992 Amendment
Amendment by
Effective Date of 1982 Amendment
Amendment by
Effective Date of 1975 Amendment
Amendment by
Cross References
Procedure for enforcement and review of Interstate Commerce Commission orders, see
Venue of actions involving Interstate Commerce Commission's order, see
Section Referred to in Other Sections
This section is referred to in
§1337. Commerce and antitrust regulations; amount in controversy, costs
(a) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action or proceeding arising under any Act of Congress regulating commerce or protecting trade and commerce against restraints and monopolies: Provided, however, That the district courts shall have original jurisdiction of an action brought under
(b) Except when express provision therefor is otherwise made in a statute of the United States, where a plaintiff who files the case under
(c) The district courts shall not have jurisdiction under this section of any matter within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of International Trade under
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646,
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §41(8), (23) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §24, pars. 8, 23,
Words "civil action" were substituted for "suits", in view of Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Changes were made in phraseology.
Amendments
1983—
1980—Subsec. (c).
1978—
Effective Date of 1980 Amendment
Amendment by
Section Referred to in Other Sections
This section is referred to in title 41 sections 607, 609.
§1338. Patents, plant variety protection, copyrights, mask works, trade-marks, and unfair competition
(a) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action arising under any Act of Congress relating to patents, plant variety protection, copyrights and trade-marks. Such jurisdiction shall be exclusive of the courts of the states in patent, plant variety protection and copyright cases.
(b) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action asserting a claim of unfair competition when joined with a substantial and related claim under the copyright, patent, plant variety protection or trade-mark laws.
(c) Subsections (a) and (b) apply to exclusive rights in mask works under
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646,
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§41(7) and 371(5) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §§24, par. 7, 256, par. 5,
Section consolidates section 41(7) with section 371 (5) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., with necessary changes in phraseology.
Words "of any civil action" were substituted for "all suits at law or in equity" and "cases" to conform section to Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Word "patents" was substituted for "patent-right" in said section 371 (Fifth) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed.
Similar provisions respecting suits cognizable in district courts, including those of territories and possessions. (See
Subsection (b) is added and is intended to avoid "piecemeal" litigation to enforce common-law and statutory copyright, patent, and trade-mark rights by specifically permitting such enforcement in a single civil action in the district court. While this is the rule under Federal decisions, this section would enact it as statutory authority. The problem is discussed at length in Hurn v. Oursler (1933, 53 S.Ct. 586, 289 U.S. 238, 77 L.Ed. 1148) and in Musher Foundation v. Alba Trading Co. (C.C.A. 1942, 127 F.2d 9) (majority and dissenting opinions).
Amendments
1988—
Subsec. (c).
1970—
Effective Date of 1970 Amendment
Amendment by
Cross References
Amount in controversy under this section, see Historical and Revision Notes under
Civil action to obtain patent or in case of interference, see
Court of Federal Claims, jurisdiction of claims against United States for patent infringement, see
Diversity of citizenship under this section, see Historical and Revision Notes under
Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, jurisdiction and legal remedy for unauthorized use or disclosure of patents and technical information, see
Infringements of—
Copyrights and rights and remedies therefor, see
Patents, see
Trade-marks, see
Jurisdiction of trade-mark actions, see
Pleading and proof in patent actions for infringement, see
Venue—
Patent or copyright actions, see
Trade-mark infringement action, see
Section Referred to in Other Sections
This section is referred to in
§1339. Postal matters
The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action arising under any Act of Congress relating to the postal service.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646,
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §41(6) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §24, par. 6,
Changes were made in phraseology.
Cross References
Amount in controversy immaterial in actions under this section, see Historical and Revision Notes under
Diversity of citizenship immaterial in action under this section, see Historical and Revision Notes under
Postal laws in general, see Title 39, Postal Service.
§1340. Internal revenue; customs duties
The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action arising under any Act of Congress providing for internal revenue, or revenue from imports or tonnage except matters within the jurisdiction of the Court of International Trade.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646,
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §41(5) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §24, par. 5,
Words "Customs Court" were substituted for "Court of Customs and Patent Appeals."
Words "any civil action" were substituted for "all cases" in view of Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Changes were made in phraseology.
Amendments
1980—
Effective Date of 1980 Amendment
Amendment by
Cross References
Action by the United States—
Collection of unpaid estate tax, see
Enforcement of tax lien or subjection of property to payment of tax, see
Recovery of erroneous tax refund, see
Action to clear title to property upon which tax lien filed by United States, see
Amount in controversy immaterial in action under this section, see Historical and Revision Notes under
Court of International Trade jurisdiction, see
Customs officers' immunity from liability, see
Diversity of citizenship immaterial in action under this section, see Historical and Revision Notes under
Jurisdiction of action for refund by taxpayer against United States, see
Prohibition of suits to restrain tax assessment or collection, see
Venue—
Action for collection of internal revenue taxes, see
Action for refund brought by taxpayer against collection officer, see
Action for refund brought by taxpayer against United States, see
Fines, penalties or forfeitures, generally, see
Judicial action to enforce forfeiture under internal revenue laws, see
Section Referred to in Other Sections
This section is referred to in title 26 section 7402.
§1341. Taxes by States
The district courts shall not enjoin, suspend or restrain the assessment, levy or collection of any tax under State law where a plain, speedy and efficient remedy may be had in the courts of such State.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646,
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §41(1) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §24, par. 1,
This section restates the last sentence of
Other provisions of
Words "at law or in equity" before "in the courts of such State" were omitted as unnecessary.
Words "civil action" were substituted for "suit" in view of Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Words "under State law" were substituted for "imposed by or pursuant to the laws of any State" for the same reason.
Section Referred to in Other Sections
This section is referred to in title 49 sections 11503, 11503a, 31706.
§1342. Rate orders of State agencies
The district courts shall not enjoin, suspend or restrain the operation of, or compliance with, any order affecting rates chargeable by a public utility and made by a State administrative agency or a rate-making body of a State political subdivision, where:
(1) Jurisdiction is based solely on diversity of citizenship or repugnance of the order to the Federal Constitution; and,
(2) The order does not interfere with interstate commerce; and,
(3) The order has been made after reasonable notice and hearing; and,
(4) A plain, speedy and efficient remedy may be had in the courts of such State.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646,
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §41(1) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §24, par. 1,
This section rearranges and restates the fourth sentence of
Other provisions of
Words "at law or in equity" before "in the courts of such State" were omitted as unnecessary.
Words "civil action" were substituted for "suit," in view of Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Word "operation" was substituted for "enforcement, operation or execution" for the same reason.
§1343. Civil rights and elective franchise
(a) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action authorized by law to be commenced by any person:
(1) To recover damages for injury to his person or property, or because of the deprivation of any right or privilege of a citizen of the United States, by any act done in furtherance of any conspiracy mentioned in
(2) To recover damages from any person who fails to prevent or to aid in preventing any wrongs mentioned in
(3) To redress the deprivation, under color of any State law, statute, ordinance, regulation, custom or usage, of any right, privilege or immunity secured by the Constitution of the United States or by any Act of Congress providing for equal rights of citizens or of all persons within the jurisdiction of the United States;
(4) To recover damages or to secure equitable or other relief under any Act of Congress providing for the protection of civil rights, including the right to vote.
(b) For purposes of this section—
(1) the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a State; and
(2) any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646,
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §41(12), (13), and (14) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §24, pars. 12, 13, 14,
Words "civil action" were substituted for "suits," "suits at law or in equity" in view of Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Numerous changes were made in arrangement and phraseology.
Amendments
1979—
1957—
1954—Act Sept. 3, 1954, substituted "
Effective Date of 1979 Amendment
Section 3 of
Cross References
Generally, see
Amount in controversy immaterial in action under this section, see Historical and Revision Notes under
Civil action for deprivation of civil rights, see
Civil action or injunction for deprivation of voting rights, see
Conspiracy against rights of citizens constituting federal crime, see
Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights, see
Diversity of citizenship immaterial in action under this section, see Historical and Revision Notes under
Section Referred to in Other Sections
This section is referred to in
§1344. Election disputes
The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action to recover possession of any office, except that of elector of President or Vice President, United States Senator, Representative in or delegate to Congress, or member of a state legislature, authorized by law to be commenced, where in it appears that the sole question touching the title to office arises out of denial of the right to vote, to any citizen offering to vote, on account of race, color or previous condition of servitude.
The jurisdiction under this section shall extend only so far as to determine the rights of the parties to office by reason of the denial of the right, guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States and secured by any law, to enforce the right of citizens of the United States to vote in all the States.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646,
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §41(15) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §24, par. 15,
Words "civil action" were substituted for "suits," in view of Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Words "United States Senator" were added, as no reason appears for including Representatives and excluding Senators. Moreover, the Seventeenth amendment, providing for the popular election of Senators, was adopted after the passage of the 1911 law on which this section is based.
Changes were made in phraseology.
Cross References
Amount in controversy immaterial in action under this section, see Historical and Revision Notes under
Diversity of citizenship immaterial in action under this section, see Historical and Revision Notes under
Jurisdiction of action for damages for injuries in voting, see
§1345. United States as plaintiff
Except as otherwise provided by Act of Congress, the district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions, suits or proceedings commenced by the United States, or by any agency or officer thereof expressly authorized to sue by Act of Congress.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646,
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §41(1) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §24, par. 1,
Other provisions of
Words "civil actions, suits or proceedings" were substituted for "suits of a civil nature, at common law or in equity" in view of Rules 2 and 81(a)(7) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Word "agency" was inserted in order that this section shall apply to actions by agencies of the Government and to conform with special acts authorizing such actions. (See definitive
The phrase "Except as otherwise provided by Act of Congress," at the beginning of the section was inserted to make clear that jurisdiction exists generally in district courts in the absence of special provisions conferring it elsewhere.
Changes were made in phraseology.
Cross References
Amount in controversy immaterial in action under this section, see Historical and Revision Notes under
Diversity of citizenship immaterial in action under this section, see Historical and Revision Notes under
Jurisdiction of—
Action against national banking association, see
Action for enforcement of fines, penalties, or forfeitures, see
Bonds executed under federal law, see
District courts in postal matters, see
Third party tort liability for hospital and medical care, see
United States as party—
Generally, see
Interstate Commerce Commission orders, see
Section Referred to in Other Sections
This section is referred to in title 12 sections 1452, 1819, 2279aa–14.
§1346. United States as defendant
(a) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction, concurrent with the United States Court of Federal Claims, of:
(1) Any civil action against the United States for the recovery of any internal-revenue tax alleged to have been erroneously or illegally assessed or collected, or any penalty claimed to have been collected without authority or any sum alleged to have been excessive or in any manner wrongfully collected under the internal-revenue laws;
(2) Any other civil action or claim against the United States, not exceeding $10,000 in amount, founded either upon the Constitution, or any Act of Congress, or any regulation of an executive department, or upon any express or implied contract with the United States, or for liquidated or unliquidated damages in cases not sounding in tort, except that the district courts shall not have jurisdiction of any civil action or claim against the United States founded upon any express or implied contract with the United States or for liquidated or unliquidated damages in cases not sounding in tort which are subject to sections 8(g)(1) and 10(a)(1) of the Contract Disputes Act of 1978. For the purpose of this paragraph, an express or implied contract with the Army and Air Force Exchange Service, Navy Exchanges, Marine Corps Exchanges, Coast Guard Exchanges, or Exchange Councils of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration shall be considered an express or implied contract with the United States.
(b) Subject to the provisions of
(c) The jurisdiction conferred by this section includes jurisdiction of any set-off, counterclaim, or other claim or demand whatever on the part of the United States against any plaintiff commencing an action under this section.
(d) The district courts shall not have jurisdiction under this section of any civil action or claim for a pension.
(e) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action against the United States provided in section 6226, 6228(a), 7426, or 7428 (in the case of the United States district court for the District of Columbia) or section 7429 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
(f) The district courts shall have exclusive original jurisdiction of civil actions under section 2409a to quiet title to an estate or interest in real property in which an interest is claimed by the United States.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646,
Historical and Revision Notes
1948 Act
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§41(20), 931(a), 932 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §24, par. 20,
Section consolidates provisions of section 41(20) conferring jurisdiction upon the district court, in civil actions against the United States, with the first sentence of section 931(a) relating to jurisdiction of the district courts in tort claims cases, and those provisions of section 932 making the provisions of said section 41(20), relating to counterclaim and set-off, applicable to tort claims cases, all of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed.
Provision in
Words "commencing an action under this section" in subsec. (c) of this revised section cover the provision in
The phrase in
Provisions in
Words in
Words in
The revised section retains the language of
The revised subsection (c)(1) omitted clause: "but no suit pending on the 27th day of June 1898 shall abate or be affected by this provision," contained in
The words "in a civil action or in admiralty," in subsection (a)(2), were substituted for "either in a court of law, equity, or admiralty" to conform to Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Words in section 41(20) "in respect to which claims the party would be entitled to redress against the United States, either in a court of law, equity, or admiralty, if the United States were suable" were omitted from subsection (a)(2) of this revised section as unnecessary. See reviser's note under
For jurisdiction of The Tax Court to review claims for refunds of processing taxes collected under the unconstitutional Agriculture Adjustment Act, see
See, also, reviser's note under
Minor changes were made in phraseology.
Senate Revision Amendment
The provision of title 28, U.S.C., §932, which related to application of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, were originally set out in section 2676 of this revised title, but such section 2676 was eliminated by Senate amendment. See 80th Congress Senate Report No. 1559, amendment No. 61.
1949 Act
This section corrects typographical errors in
References in Text
The internal-revenue laws, referred to in subsec. (a)(1), are classified generally to Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.
Sections 8(g)(1) and 10(a)(1) of the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, referred to in subsec. (a)(2), are classified to
Sections 6226, 6228(a), 7426, 7428, and 7429 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, referred to in subsec. (e), are classified to sections 6226, 6228(a), 7426, 7428, and 7429, respectively, of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.
Amendments
1992—Subsec. (a).
1986—Subsec. (e).
1982—Subsec. (a).
Subsec. (e).
1978—Subsec. (a)(2).
1976—Subsec. (e).
1972—Subsec. (f).
1970—Subsec. (a)(2).
1966—Subsec. (e).
1964—Subsec. (d).
1958—Subsec. (b).
1954—Subsec. (a)(1). Act July 30, 1954, struck out language imposing jurisdictional limitation of $10,000 on suits to recover taxes.
1951—Subsec. (d). Act Oct. 31, 1951, inserted references to "claim" and "employees".
1949—Subsec. (a)(1). Act May 24, 1949, §80(a), inserted ", (i) if the claim does not exceed $10,000 or (ii)".
Subsec. (b). Acts Apr. 25, 1949, and May 24, 1949, §80(b), made a technical change to correct "
Effective Date of 1992 Amendment
Amendment by
Effective Date of 1982 Amendments
Amendment by
Amendment by
Effective Date of 1978 Amendment
Amendment by
Effective Date of 1970 Amendment
Section 2 of
"(a) In addition to granting jurisdiction over suits brought after the date of enactment of this Act [July 23, 1970], the provisions of this Act [amending this section and
"(b) The provisions of subsection (a) of this section shall apply notwithstanding a determination or judgment made prior to the date of enactment of this Act that the United States district courts or the United States Court of Claims did not have jurisdiction to entertain a suit on an express or implied contract with a nonappropriated fund instrumentality of the United States described in section 1 of this Act."
Effective Date of 1966 Amendment
Section 203 of title II of
Effective Date of 1958 Amendment
Amendment by
Termination of United States District Court for the District of the Canal Zone
For termination of the United States District Court for the District of the Canal Zone at end of the "transition period", being the 30-month period beginning Oct. 1, 1979, and ending midnight Mar. 31, 1982, see Paragraph 5 of Article XI of the Panama Canal Treaty of 1977 and
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
Costs where United States is party, see rule 54, Appendix to this title.
Cross References
Costs where United States is party, see
Court of Federal Claims jurisdiction, see
Interest on judgments against United States, see
Jury trial denied in actions under this section, see
Nuclear incident involving nuclear reactor of United States warship, payment of claims or judgments for bodily injury, death, or damage resulting from, see
Remedy under this section for damages caused by operation of motor vehicles by Government employees to be exclusive of any other civil action or proceeding, see
Tax Court jurisdiction, see
Time for commencing action against United States, see
Tort claims procedure, see
Venue of actions against United States, see
Section Referred to in Other Sections
This section is referred to in
§1347. Partition action where United States is joint tenant
The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action commenced by any tenant in common or joint tenant for the partition of lands where the United States is one of the tenants in common or joint tenants.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646,
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §41(25) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §24, par. 25,
The venue provision in
Words "civil action" were substituted for "suits in equity," in view of Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
A change was made in phraseology.
Cross References
Amount in controversy immaterial in action under this section, see Historical and Revision Notes under
Diversity of citizenship immaterial in action under this section, see Historical and Revision Notes under
Venue of action for partition of lands where United States is tenant in common or joint tenant, see
Section Referred to in Other Sections
This section is referred to in
§1348. Banking association as party
The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action commenced by the United States, or by direction of any officer thereof, against any national banking association, any civil action to wind up the affairs of any such association, and any action by a banking association established in the district for which the court is held, under
All national banking associations shall, for the purposes of all other actions by or against them, be deemed citizens of the States in which they are respectively located.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646,
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §41(16) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §24, par. 16,
Words "any civil action" were substituted for "all cases," in view of Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Words "real, personal, or mixed, and all suits in equity," after "all other actions by or against them," were omitted as superfluous.
Exception as to Transfer of Functions
Functions vested by any provision of law in the Comptroller of the Currency, referred to in this section, were not included in the transfer of functions of officers, agencies and employees of the Department of the Treasury to the Secretary of the Treasury, made by Reorg. Plan No. 26 of 1950, §1, eff. July 31, 1950, 15 F.R. 4935,
Cross References
Amount in controversy—
Immaterial in action other than on diverse citizenship, see Historical and Revision Notes under
Required in diverse citizenship action under this section, see Historical and Revision Notes under
Jurisdiction of action by or against—
Federal reserve bank, see
Liquidating agent of national bank, see
National bank receiver, see
Powers of conservator of national bank, see
Prohibition on state court from enjoining national bank, see
Venue of action—
Against national banking association, see
By banking association to enjoin the Comptroller of the Currency, see
§1349. Corporation organized under federal law as party
The district courts shall not have jurisdiction of any civil action by or against any corporation upon the ground that it was incorporated by or under an Act of Congress, unless the United States is the owner of more than one-half of its capital stock.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646,
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §42 (Feb. 13, 1925, ch. 229, §12,
Words "civil action" were substituted for "action or suit," in view of Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Minor changes were made in phraseology.
Cross References
Action arising under law of United States, see
Action by agency of United States, see
Action by or against—
Federal land banks, see
Federal reserve banks, see
National banking association, see
Section Referred to in Other Sections
This section is referred to in title 12 sections 1452, 2279aa–14.
§1350. Alien's action for tort
The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action by an alien for a tort only, committed in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the United States.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646,
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §41(17) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §24, par. 17,
Words "civil action" were substituted for "suits," in view of Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Changes in phraseology were made.
Torture Victim Protection
"SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
"This Act may be cited as the 'Torture Victim Protection Act of 1991'.
"SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF CIVIL ACTION.
"(a)
"(1) subjects an individual to torture shall, in a civil action, be liable for damages to that individual; or
"(2) subjects an individual to extrajudicial killing shall, in a civil action, be liable for damages to the individual's legal representative, or to any person who may be a claimant in an action for wrongful death.
"(b)
"(c)
"SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.
"(a)
"(b)
"(1) the term 'torture' means any act, directed against an individual in the offender's custody or physical control, by which severe pain or suffering (other than pain or suffering arising only from or inherent in, or incidental to, lawful sanctions), whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on that individual for such purposes as obtaining from that individual or a third person information or a confession, punishing that individual for an act that individual or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, intimidating or coercing that individual or a third person, or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind; and
"(2) mental pain or suffering refers to prolonged mental harm caused by or resulting from—
"(A) the intentional infliction or threatened infliction of severe physical pain or suffering;
"(B) the administration or application, or threatened administration or application, of mind altering substances or other procedures calculated to disrupt profoundly the senses or the personality;
"(C) the threat of imminent death; or
"(D) the threat that another individual will imminently be subjected to death, severe physical pain or suffering, or the administration or application of mind altering substances or other procedures calculated to disrupt profoundly the senses or personality."
Cross References
Amount in controversy immaterial in action under this section, see Historical and Revision Notes under
§1351. Consuls, vice consuls, and members of a diplomatic mission as defendant
The district courts shall have original jurisdiction, exclusive of the courts of the States, of all civil actions and proceedings against—
(1) consuls or vice consuls of foreign states; or
(2) members of a mission or members of their families (as such terms are defined in section 2 of the Diplomatic Relations Act).
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646,
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§41(18), 371(8) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §§24, par. 18, 256, par. 8,
Words "civil action" were substituted for "suits," and "all suits and proceedings" in view of Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Changes were made in phraseology.
References in Text
Section 2 of the Diplomatic Relations Act, referred to in par. (2), is classified to
Amendments
1978—
1949—Act May 24, 1949, substituted "of all actions and proceedings" for "of any civil action".
Effective Date of 1978 Amendment
Amendment by
Cross References
Amount in controversy immaterial in action under this section, see Historical and Revision Notes under
Diversity of citizenship immaterial in action under this section, see Historical and Revision Notes under
Judicial power extended in cases affecting consuls, see Const. Art. 3, §2, cl. 1.
§1352. Bonds executed under federal law
The district courts shall have original jurisdiction, concurrent with State courts, of any action on a bond executed under any law of the United States, except matters within the jurisdiction of the Court of International Trade under
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646,
Historical and Revision Notes
This section is necessary to permit actions in the district courts upon any bond authorized by a law of the United States. In the absence of this new provision, such actions could not be maintained except by the United States, where the amount and other jurisdictional requisites did not exist. The new section also makes clear that it does not affect the right to prosecute such actions in State courts.
Amendments
1980—
Effective Date of 1980 Amendment
Amendment by
§1353. Indian allotments
The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action involving the right of any person, in whole or in part of Indian blood or descent, to any allotment of land under any Act of Congress or treaty.
The judgment in favor of any claimant to an allotment of land shall have the same effect, when properly certified to the Secretary of the Interior, as if such allotment had been allowed and approved by him; but this provision shall not apply to any lands held on or before December 21, 1911, by either of the Five Civilized Tribes, the Osage Nation of Indians, nor to any of the lands within the Quapaw Indian Agency.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646,
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §41(24) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §24, par. 24,
Words "any civil action" were substituted for "all actions, suits, or proceedings," in view of Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
The sentence "The right of appeal shall be allowed to either party as in other cases" was omitted as covered by
Changes in phraseology were made.
Cross References
Amount in controversy immaterial in action under this section, see Historical and Revision Notes under
Jurisdiction of action for allotment, see
§1354. Land grants from different states
The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of actions between citizens of the same state claiming lands under grants from different states.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646,
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §41(1) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §24, par. 1,
Other provisions of
Changes were made in phraseology.
Cross References
Amount in controversy immaterial in action under this section, see Historical and Revision Notes under
§1355. Fine, penalty or forfeiture
(a) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction, exclusive of the courts of the States, of any action or proceeding for the recovery or enforcement of any fine, penalty, or forfeiture, pecuniary or otherwise, incurred under any Act of Congress, except matters within the jurisdiction of the Court of International Trade under
(b)(1) A forfeiture action or proceeding may be brought in—
(A) the district court for the district in which any of the acts or omissions giving rise to the forfeiture occurred, or
(B) any other district where venue for the forfeiture action or proceeding is specifically provided for in
(2) Whenever property subject to forfeiture under the laws of the United States is located in a foreign country, or has been detained or seized pursuant to legal process or competent authority of a foreign government, an action or proceeding for forfeiture may be brought as provided in paragraph (1), or in the United States District court 1 for the District of Columbia.
(c) In any case in which a final order disposing of property in a civil forfeiture action or proceeding is appealed, removal of the property by the prevailing party shall not deprive the court of jurisdiction. Upon motion of the appealing party, the district court or the court of appeals shall issue any order necessary to preserve the right of the appealing party to the full value of the property at issue, including a stay of the judgment of the district court pending appeal or requiring the prevailing party to post an appeal bond.
(d) Any court with jurisdiction over a forfeiture action pursuant to subsection (b) may issue and cause to be served in any other district such process as may be required to bring before the court the property that is the subject of the forfeiture action.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646,
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§41(9) and 371(2) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §§24, par. 9, 256, par. 2,
Word "fine" was inserted so that this section will apply to the many provisions in the United States Code for fines which are essentially civil. (See, also,
Words "pecuniary or otherwise" were added to make this section expressly applicable to both pecuniary and property forfeitures. The original section was so construed in Miller v. United States, 1870, 11 Wall. 268, 20 L.Ed. 135; Tyler v. Defrees, 1870, 11 Wall. 331, and The Rosemary, C.C.A. 1928, 26 F.2d 354, certiorari denied 49 S.Ct. 23, 278 U.S. 619, 73 L.Ed. 542.
Changes were made in phraseology.
Amendments
1992—
1980—
Effective Date of 1980 Amendment
Amendment by
Cross References
Actions for forfeiture under customs laws, see
Amount in controversy immaterial in action under this section, see Historical and Revision Notes under
Diversity of citizenship immaterial in action under this section, see Historical and Revision Notes under
Fines, penalties and forfeitures, proceedings, see
Venue of action for fine, penalty, or forfeiture see
Section Referred to in Other Sections
This section is referred to in title 21 sections 360pp, 842.
1 So in original. Probably should be capitalized.
§1356. Seizures not within admiralty and maritime jurisdiction
The district courts shall have original jurisdiction, exclusive of the courts of the States, of any seizure under any law of the United States on land or upon waters not within admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, except matters within the jurisdiction of the Court of International Trade under
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646,
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§41(3) and 371(4) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §§24, par. 3, 256, par. 4,
Section consolidates certain provisions of
Changes were made in arrangement and phraseology.
Amendments
1980—
Effective Date of 1980 Amendment
Amendment by
Cross References
Amount in controversy immaterial in action under this section, see Historical and Revision Notes under
Diversity of citizenship immaterial in action under this section, see Historical and Revision Notes under
Jurisdiction of—
Admiralty, maritime and prize cases, see
Fine, penalty, or forfeiture, see
§1357. Injuries under Federal laws
The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action commenced by any person to recover damages for any injury to his person or property on account of any act done by him, under any Act of Congress, for the protection or collection of any of the revenues, or to enforce the right of citizens of the United States to vote in any State.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646,
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §41(11) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §24, par. 11,
Words "any civil action" were substituted for "all suits," in view of Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Minor changes were made in phraseology.
Cross References
Amount in controversy immaterial in action under this section, see Historical and Revision Notes under
Diversity of citizenship immaterial in action under this section, see Historical and Revision Notes under
§1358. Eminent domain
The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all proceedings to condemn real estate for the use of the United States or its departments or agencies.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646,
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on
The venue provisions of
Other provisions of
Changes were made in phraseology.
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
Procedure in condemnation proceedings, see rule 71A, Appendix to this title.
Cross References
Amount in controversy immaterial in proceedings under this section, see Historical and Revision Notes under
Armed forces, acquisition of property, see
Coast Guard, acquisition of land, see
Condemnation of property, right of Government officials, see
Declaration of taking proceedings in eminent domain, see
District of Columbia, procedure in condemnation proceedings, see D.C. Code, §16–1301 et seq.
Irrigation project, acquisition of land, see
Lumber production, acquisition of property for, see
Reclamation projects, compensation for rights-of-way, see
River and harbor improvements, acquisition of land, see
Tennessee Valley Authority, procedure in condemnation proceedings, see
Venue of eminent domain proceedings, see
Section Referred to in Other Sections
This section is referred to in title 16 section 79c; title 50 section 167f.
§1359. Parties collusively joined or made
A district court shall not have jurisdiction of a civil action in which any party, by assignment or otherwise, has been improperly or collusively made or joined to invoke the jurisdiction of such court.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646,
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed. §§41(1) and 80 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §§24(1), 37,
Other provisions of
Provisions of
Provisions of
The assignee clause in
The revised section changes this clause by confining its application to cases wherein the assignment is improperly or collusively made to invoke jurisdiction. Furthermore, the difficulty of applying the original clause is overcome and the original purpose of such clause is better served by substantially following
The assignee clause was incorporated in the original Judiciary Act of 1789. Such section 80 was enacted in 1875. The history of the assignee clause "shows clearly that its purpose and effect, at the time of its enactment were to prevent the conferring of jurisdiction on the Federal courts, on grounds of diversity of citizenship, by assignment, in cases where it would not otherwise exist." (Sowell v. Federal Reserve Bank, 1925, 45 S.Ct. 528, 529, 268 U.S. 449, 453, 69 L.Ed. 1041, 1048.) Thus the purpose of the assignee clause was to prevent the manufacture of Federal jurisdiction by the device of assignment. It achieves this purpose only partially. For example, the assignee clause excepts two types of choses in action from its coverage: (1) Foreign bill of exchange; and (2) corporate bearer paper. But this does not prevent the use of assignment of these choses in action to create the necessary diversity or alienage for jurisdictional purposes. Such section 80 does, however, prevent that. (See Bullard v. City of Cisco, 1933, 54 S.Ct. 177, 290 U.S. 179, 78 L.Ed. 254, 93 A.L.R. 141.) Its coverage against collusive jurisdiction is unlimited, and its approach is direct. The assignee clause, on the other hand, prevents the bona fide assignee of a chose in action within its terms from resorting to the Federal courts unless there is jurisdiction to support the assignee-plaintiff's case and a showing that there would have been jurisdiction if the assignor had brought the action in lieu of the assignee-plaintiff. Since the assignee clause deals with the bona fide assignee, there has been much litigation to determine the assignments which should or should not be within the purview of the clause. Thus the courts have thought it advisable to limit the term "chose in action" and exclude from its scope (1) an implied in law duty or promise, and (2) a transfer of a property interest; and to exclude an assignment by operation of law from the coverage of the clause. Intermediate assignments and reassignment also give difficulty.
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
Defenses and objections, pleadings allowed and form of motions, see rules 7 and 12, Appendix to this title.
Parties, see rules 17 to 25.
Cross References
Amendment of pleadings to show jurisdiction, see
Costs on dismissal for lack of jurisdiction, see
Removed cases, remand to State court for lack of jurisdiction, see
§1360. State civil jurisdiction in actions to which Indians are parties
(a) Each of the States listed in the following table shall have jurisdiction over civil causes of action between Indians or to which Indians are parties which arise in the areas of Indian country listed opposite the name of the State to the same extent that such State has jurisdiction over other civil causes of action, and those civil laws of such State that are of general application to private persons or private property shall have the same force and effect within such Indian country as they have elsewhere within the State:
State of | Indian country affected |
---|---|
Alaska | All Indian country within the State. |
California | All Indian country within the State. |
Minnesota | All Indian country within the State, except the Red Lake Reservation. |
Nebraska | All Indian country within the State. |
Oregon | All Indian country within the State, except the Warm Springs Reservation. |
Wisconsin | All Indian country within the State. |
(b) Nothing in this section shall authorize the alienation, encumbrance, or taxation of any real or personal property, including water rights, belonging to any Indian or any Indian tribe, band, or community that is held in trust by the United States or is subject to a restriction against alienation imposed by the United States; or shall authorize regulation of the use of such property in a manner inconsistent with any Federal treaty, agreement, or statute or with any regulation made pursuant thereto; or shall confer jurisdiction upon the State to adjudicate, in probate proceedings or otherwise, the ownership or right to possession of such property or any interest therein.
(c) Any tribal ordinance or custom heretofore or hereafter adopted by an Indian tribe, band, or community in the exercise of any authority which it may possess shall, if not inconsistent with any applicable civil law of the State, be given full force and effect in the determination of civil causes of action pursuant to this section.
(Added Aug. 15, 1953, ch. 505, §4,
Amendments
1984—Subsec. (a).
1978—Subsec. (a).
1958—Subsec. (a).
1954—Subsec. (a). Act Aug. 24, 1954, brought the Menominee Tribe within the provisions of this section.
Effective Date of 1984 Amendment
Amendment by
Admission of Alaska as State
Admission of Alaska into the Union was accomplished Jan. 3, 1959, on issuance of Proc. No. 3269, Jan. 3, 1959, 24 F.R. 81, 73 Stat. c16, as required by sections 1 and 8(c) of
Amendment of State Constitutions To Remove Legal Impediment; Effective Date
Section 6 of act Aug. 15, 1953, provided that: "Notwithstanding the provisions of any Enabling Act for the admission of a State, the consent of the United States is hereby given to the people of any State to amend, where necessary, their State constitution or existing statutes, as the case may be, to remove any legal impediment to the assumption of civil and criminal jurisdiction in accordance with the provisions of this Act [adding this section and
Consent of United States to Other States To Assume Jurisdiction
Act Aug. 15, 1953, ch. 505, §7,
Retrocession of jurisdiction by State acquired by State pursuant to section 7 of Act Aug. 15, 1953, prior to its repeal, see
Section Referred to in Other Sections
This section is referred to in title 25 sections 566e, 711e, 713f, 714e, 715d, 1300b–15, 1300f, 1300i–1, 1323, 1747, 1772d, 1918.
§1361. Action to compel an officer of the United States to perform his duty
The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any action in the nature of mandamus to compel an officer or employee of the United States or any agency thereof to perform a duty owed to the plaintiff.
(Added
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
Writ of mandamus abolished in United States district courts, but relief available by appropriate action or motion, see rule 81, Appendix to this title.
Section Referred to in Other Sections
This section is referred to in title 18 section 923; title 25 section 2103; title 42 sections 300j–9, 5851, 7622.
§1362. Indian tribes
The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions, brought by any Indian tribe or band with a governing body duly recognized by the Secretary of the Interior, wherein the matter in controversy arises under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States.
(Added
Section Referred to in Other Sections
This section is referred to in title 25 section 1725.
§1363. Jurors' employment rights
The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action brought for the protection of jurors' employment under
(Added
Prior Provisions
A prior section 1363 was renumbered
Effective Date
Section 7 of
"(a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, the amendments made by this Act [enacting this section and section 1875, renumbering section 1363, relating to construction of references to laws of the United States or Acts of Congress, as section 1364, and amending
"(b) The amendment made by section 5 of this Act [amending
§1364. Direct actions against insurers of members of diplomatic missions and their families
(a) The district courts shall have original and exclusive jurisdiction, without regard to the amount in controversy, of any civil action commenced by any person against an insurer who by contract has insured an individual, who is, or was at the time of the tortious act or omission, a member of a mission (within the meaning of section 2(3) of the Diplomatic Relations Act (
(b) Any direct action brought against an insurer under subsection (a) shall be tried without a jury, but shall not be subject to the defense that the insured is immune from suit, that the insured is an indispensable party, or in the absence of fraud or collusion, that the insured has violated a term of the contract, unless the contract was cancelled before the claim arose.
(Added
Codification
Two other sections 1364 were renumbered
Amendments
1987—Subsec. (a).
1982—Subsec. (a).
Effective Date of 1987 Amendment
Section 138(b) of
Effective Date of 1982 Amendment
Amendment by
Effective Date
Section effective at end of ninety-day period beginning on Sept. 30, 1978, see section 9 of
§1365. Senate actions
(a) The United States District Court for the District of Columbia shall have original jurisdiction, without regard to the amount in controversy, over any civil action brought by the Senate or any authorized committee or subcommittee of the Senate to enforce, to secure a declaratory judgment concerning the validity of, or to prevent a threatened refusal or failure to comply with, any subpena or order issued by the Senate or committee or subcommittee of the Senate to any entity acting or purporting to act under color or authority of State law or to any natural person to secure the production of documents or other materials of any kind or the answering of any deposition or interrogatory or to secure testimony or any combination thereof. This section shall not apply to an action to enforce, to secure a declaratory judgment concerning the validity of, or to prevent a threatened refusal to comply with, any subpena or order issued to an officer or employee of the Federal Government acting within his official capacity.
(b) Upon application by the Senate or any authorized committee or subcommittee of the Senate, the district court shall issue an order to an entity or person refusing, or failing to comply with, or threatening to refuse or not to comply with, a subpena or order of the Senate or committee or subcommittee of the Senate requiring such entity or person to comply forthwith. Any refusal or failure to obey a lawful order of the district court issued pursuant to this section may be held by such court to be a contempt thereof. A contempt proceeding shall be commenced by an order to show cause before the court why the entity or person refusing or failing to obey the court order should not be held in contempt of court. Such contempt proceeding shall be tried by the court and shall be summary in manner. The purpose of sanctions imposed as a result of such contempt proceeding shall be to compel obedience to the order of the court. Process in any such action or contempt proceeding may be served in any judicial district wherein the entity or party refusing, or failing to comply, or threatening to refuse or not to comply, resides, transacts business, or may be found, and subpenas for witnesses who are required to attend such proceeding may run into any other district. Nothing in this section shall confer upon such court jurisdiction to affect by injunction or otherwise the issuance or effect of any subpena or order of the Senate or any committee or subcommittee of the Senate or to review, modify, suspend, terminate, or set aside any such subpena or order. An action, contempt proceeding, or sanction brought or imposed pursuant to this section shall not abate upon adjournment sine die by the Senate at the end of a Congress if the Senate or the committee or subcommittee of the Senate which issued the subpena or order certifies to the court that it maintains its interest in securing the documents, answers, or testimony during such adjournment.
[(c) Repealed.
(d) The Senate or any committee or subcommittee of the Senate commencing and prosecuting a civil action or contempt proceeding under this section may be represented in such action by such attorneys as the Senate may designate.
(e) A civil action commenced or prosecuted under this section, may not be authorized pursuant to the Standing Order of the Senate "authorizing suits by Senate Committees" (S. Jour. 572, May 28, 1928).
(f) For the purposes of this section the term "committee" includes standing, select, or special committees of the Senate established by law or resolution.
(Added
Amendments
1984—Subsec. (c).
Effective Date of 1984 Amendment
Amendment by
Effective Date
Section effective Jan. 3, 1979, see section 717 of
Section Referred to in Other Sections
This section is referred to in title 2 sections 288d, 1207.
§1366. Construction of references to laws of the United States or Acts of Congress
For the purposes of this chapter, references to laws of the United States or Acts of Congress do not include laws applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia.
(Added
§1367. Supplemental jurisdiction
(a) Except as provided in subsections (b) and (c) or as expressly provided otherwise by Federal statute, in any civil action of which the district courts have original jurisdiction, the district courts shall have supplemental jurisdiction over all other claims that are so related to claims in the action within such original jurisdiction that they form part of the same case or controversy under Article III of the United States Constitution. Such supplemental jurisdiction shall include claims that involve the joinder or intervention of additional parties.
(b) In any civil action of which the district courts have original jurisdiction founded solely on
(c) The district courts may decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over a claim under subsection (a) if—
(1) the claim raises a novel or complex issue of State law,
(2) the claim substantially predominates over the claim or claims over which the district court has original jurisdiction,
(3) the district court has dismissed all claims over which it has original jurisdiction, or
(4) in exceptional circumstances, there are other compelling reasons for declining jurisdiction.
(d) The period of limitations for any claim asserted under subsection (a), and for any other claim in the same action that is voluntarily dismissed at the same time as or after the dismissal of the claim under subsection (a), shall be tolled while the claim is pending and for a period of 30 days after it is dismissed unless State law provides for a longer tolling period.
(e) As used in this section, the term "State" includes the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and any territory or possession of the United States.
(Added
References in Text
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, referred to in subsec. (b), are set out in the Appendix to this title.
Effective Date
Section 310(c) of
§1368. Counterclaims in unfair practices in international trade.
The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action based on a counterclaim raised pursuant to section 337(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to the extent that it arises out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the opposing party's claim in the proceeding under section 337(a) of that Act.
(Added
References in Text
Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, referred to in text, is classified to
Effective Date
Section applicable with respect to complaints filed under