CHAPTER 25 —INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT
SUBCHAPTER I—RESPONSIBILITY FOR ACQUISITIONS OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Part A—Director of Office of Management and Budget
Part B—Executive Agencies
Part C—Other Responsibilities
Part D—National Security Systems
SUBCHAPTER II—PROCESS FOR ACQUISITIONS OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
SUBCHAPTER III—INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACQUISITION PILOT PROGRAMS
Part A—Conduct of Pilot Programs
Part B—Specific Pilot Programs
SUBCHAPTER IV—ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT MATTERS
Chapter Referred to in Other Sections
This chapter is referred to in title 5 sections 9505, 9508; title 10 section 2315; title 28 section 612; title 38 section 310; title 44 section 3504.
§1401. Definitions
In this chapter:
(1) Director
The term "Director" means the Director of the Office of Management and Budget.
(2) Executive agency
The term "executive agency" has the meaning given that term in
(3) Information technology
(A) The term "information technology", with respect to an executive agency means any equipment or interconnected system or subsystem of equipment, that is used in the automatic acquisition, storage, manipulation, management, movement, control, display, switching, interchange, transmission, or reception of data or information by the executive agency. For purposes of the preceding sentence, equipment is used by an executive agency if the equipment is used by the executive agency directly or is used by a contractor under a contract with the executive agency which (i) requires the use of such equipment, or (ii) requires the use, to a significant extent, of such equipment in the performance of a service or the furnishing of a product.
(B) The term "information technology" includes computers, ancillary equipment, software, firmware and similar procedures, services (including support services), and related resources.
(C) Notwithstanding subparagraphs (A) and (B), the term "information technology" does not include any equipment that is acquired by a Federal contractor incidental to a Federal contract.
(4) Information resources
The term "information resources" has the meaning given such term in
(5) Information resources management
The term "information resources management" has the meaning given such term in
(6) Information system
The term "information system" has the meaning given such term in
(7) Commercial item
The term "commercial item" has the meaning given that term in
(
References in Text
This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this division" meaning division E (§§5001–5703) of
Effective Date
Section 5701 of title LVII of div. E of
Short Title
Section 5001 of div. E of
Savings Provision
Section 5702 of title LVII of div. E of
"(a)
"(1) which have been issued, made, granted, or allowed to become effective by the Administrator of General Services or the General Services Board of Contract Appeals, or by a court of competent jurisdiction, in connection with an acquisition activity carried out under section 111 of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 ([former] 40 U.S.C. 759), and
"(2) which are in effect on the effective date of this division [see Effective Date note above],
shall continue in effect according to their terms until modified, terminated, superseded, set aside, or revoked in accordance with law by the Director or any other authorized official, by a court of competent jurisdiction, or by operation of law.
"(b)
"(1)
"(2)
"(3)
"(4)
"(5)
"(c)
Rules of Construction
Section 5703 of title LVII of div. E of
"(a)
"(b)
Ex. Ord. No. 13011. Federal Information Technology
Ex. Ord. No. 13011, July 16, 1996, 61 F.R. 37657, provided:
A Government that works better and costs less requires efficient and effective information systems. The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 [
Accordingly, by the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows:
(b) refocus information technology management to support directly their strategic missions, implement an investment review process that drives budget formulation and execution for information systems, and rethink and restructure the way they perform their functions before investing in information technology to support that work;
(c) establish clear accountability for information resources management activities by creating agency Chief Information Officers (CIOs) with the visibility and management responsibilities necessary to advise the agency head on the design, development, and implementation of those information systems. These responsibilities include: (1) participating in the investment review process for information systems; (2) monitoring and evaluating the performance of those information systems on the basis of applicable performance measures; and, (3) as necessary, advising the agency head to modify or terminate those systems;
(d) cooperate in the use of information technology to improve the productivity of Federal programs and to promote a coordinated, interoperable, secure, and shared Governmentwide infrastructure that is provided and supported by a diversity of private sector suppliers and a well-trained corps of information technology professionals; and
(e) establish an interagency support structure that builds on existing successful interagency efforts and shall provide expertise and advice to agencies; expand the skill and career development opportunities of information technology professionals; improve the management and use of information technology within and among agencies by developing information technology procedures and standards and by identifying and sharing experiences, ideas, and promising practices; and provide innovative, multi-disciplinary, project-specific support to agencies to enhance interoperability, minimize unnecessary duplication of effort, and capitalize on agency successes.
(b) strengthen the quality of decisions about the employment of information resources to meet mission needs through integrated analysis, planning, budgeting, and evaluation processes, including:
(1) determining, before making investments in new information systems, whether the Government should be performing the function, if the private sector or another agency should support the function, and if the function needs to be or has been appropriately redesigned to improve its efficiency;
(2) establishing mission-based performance measures for information systems investments, aligned with agency performance plans prepared pursuant to the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 (
(3) establishing agency-wide and project-level management structures and processes responsible and accountable for managing, selecting, controlling, and evaluating investments in information systems, with authority for terminating information systems when appropriate;
(4) supporting appropriate training of personnel; and
(5) seeking the advice of, participating in, and supporting the interagency support structure set forth in this order;
(c) select CIOs with the experience and skills necessary to accomplish the duties set out in law and policy, including this order, and involve the CIO at the highest level of the agency in the processes and decisions set out in this section;
(d) ensure that the information security policies, procedures, and practices of the executive agency are adequate;
(e) where appropriate, and in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation and guidance to be issued by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), structure major information systems investments into manageable projects as narrow in scope and brief in duration as practicable, consistent with the Information Technology Act, to reduce risk, promote flexibility and interoperability, increase accountability, and better correlate mission need with current technology and market conditions; and
(f) to the extent permitted by law, enter into a contract that provides for multiagency acquisitions of information technology as an executive agent for the Government, if and in the manner that the Director of OMB considers it advantageous to do so.
(1) develop recommendations for overall Federal information technology management policy, procedures, and standards;
(2) share experiences, ideas, and promising practices, including work process redesign and the development of performance measures, to improve the management of information resources;
(3) identify opportunities, make recommendations for, and sponsor cooperation in using information resources;
(4) assess and address the hiring, training, classification, and professional development needs of the Federal Government with respect to information resources management;
(5) make recommendations and provide advice to appropriate executive agencies and organizations, including advice to OMB on the Governmentwide strategic plan required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; and
(6) seek the views of the Chief Financial Officers Council, Government Information Technology Services Board, Information Technology Resources Board, Federal Procurement Council, industry, academia, and State and local governments on matters of concern to the Council as appropriate.
(b) Membership. The CIO Council shall be composed of the CIOs and Deputy CIOs of the following executive agencies plus two representatives from other agencies:
1. Department of State;
2. Department of the Treasury;
3. Department of Defense;
4. Department of Justice;
5. Department of the Interior;
6. Department of Agriculture;
7. Department of Commerce;
8. Department of Labor;
9. Department of Health and Human Services;
10. Department of Housing and Urban Development;
11. Department of Transportation;
12. Department of Energy;
13. Department of Education;
14. Department of Veterans Affairs;
15. Environmental Protection Agency;
16. Federal Emergency Management Agency;
17. Central Intelligence Agency;
18. Small Business Administration;
19. Social Security Administration;
20. Department of the Army;
21. Department of the Navy;
22. Department of the Air Force;
23. National Aeronautics and Space Administration;
24. Agency for International Development;
25. General Services Administration;
26. National Science Foundation;
27. Nuclear Regulatory Commission; and
28. Office of Personnel Management.
The Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs of OMB, the Controller of the Office of Federal Financial Management of OMB, the Administrator of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy of OMB, a Senior Representative of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, the Chair of the Government Information Technology Services Board, and the Chair of the Information Technology Resources Board shall also be members. The CIO Council shall be chaired by the Deputy Director for Management of OMB. The Vice Chair, elected by the CIO Council on a rotating basis, shall be an agency CIO.
(a) Purpose and Functions. A Government Information Technology Services Board ("Services Board") is established to ensure continued implementation of the information technology recommendations of the National Performance Review and to identify and promote the development of innovative technologies, standards, and practices among agencies and State and local governments and the private sector. It shall seek the views of experts from industry, academia, and State and local governments on matters of concern to the Services Board as appropriate. The Services Board shall also make recommendations to the agencies, the CIO Council, OMB, and others as appropriate, and assist in the following:
(1) creating opportunities for cross-agency cooperation and intergovernmental approaches in using information resources to support common operational areas and to develop and provide shared governmentwide infrastructure services;
(2) developing shared governmentwide information infrastructure services to be used for innovative, multiagency information technology projects;
(3) creating and utilizing affinity groups for particular business or technology areas; and
(4) developing with the National Institute of Standards and Technology and with established standards bodies, standards and guidelines pertaining to Federal information systems, consistent with the limitations contained in the Computer Security Act of 1987 (
(b) Membership. The Services Board shall be composed of individuals from agencies based on their proven expertise or accomplishments in fields necessary to achieve its goals. Major government mission areas such as electronic benefits, electronic commerce, law enforcement, environmental protection, national defense, and health care may be represented on the Services Board to provide a program operations perspective. Initial selection of members will be made by OMB in consultation with other agencies as appropriate. The CIO Council may nominate two members. The Services Board shall recommend new members to OMB for consideration. The Chair will be elected by the Services Board.
(a) Purpose and Functions. An Information Technology Resources Board ("Resources Board") is established to provide independent assessments to assist in the development, acquisition, and management of selected major information systems and to provide recommendations to agency heads and OMB as appropriate. The Resources Board shall:
(1) review, at the request of an agency and OMB, specific information systems proposed or under development and make recommendations to the agency and OMB regarding the status of systems or next steps;
(2) publicize lessons learned and promising practices based on information systems reviewed by the Board; and
(3) seek the views of experts from industry, academia, and State and local governments on matters of concern to the Resources Board, as appropriate.
(b) Membership. The Resources Board shall be composed of individuals from executive branch agencies based on their knowledge of information technology, program, or acquisition management within Federal agencies. Selection of members shall be made by OMB in consultation with other agencies as appropriate. The Chair will be elected by the Resources Board. The Resources Board may call upon the department or agency whose project is being reviewed, or any other department or agency to provide knowledgeable representative(s) to the Board whose guidance and expertise will assist in focusing on the primary issue(s) presented by a specific system.
(1) evaluate agency information resources management practices and, as part of the budget process, analyze, track and evaluate the risks and results of all major capital investments for information systems;
(2) notify an agency if it believes that a major information system requires outside assistance;
(3) provide guidance on the implementation of this order and on the management of information resources to the executive agencies and to the Boards established by this order; and
(4) evaluate the effectiveness of the management structure set out in this order after 3 years and make recommendations for any appropriate changes.
(1) continue to manage the FTS2000 program and coordinate the follow-on to that program, on behalf of and with the advice of customer agencies;
(2) develop, maintain, and disseminate for the use of the Federal community, as requested by OMB or the agencies, recommended methods and strategies for the development and acquisition of information technology;
(3) conduct and manage outreach programs in cooperation with agency managers;
(4) be a focal point for liaison on information resources management, including Federal information technology, with State and local governments, and with nongovernmental international organizations subject to prior consultation with the Secretary of State to ensure such liaison would be consistent with and support overall United States foreign policy objectives;
(5) support the activities of the Secretary of State for liaison, consultation, and negotiation with intergovernmental organizations in information resources management matters;
(6) assist OMB, as requested, in evaluating agencies' performance-based management tracking systems and agencies' achievement of cost, schedule, and performance goals; and
(7) provide support and assistance to the interagency groups established in this order.
(b) The Secretary of State shall advise the Director on the development of United States positions and policies on international information policy and technology issues affecting Federal Government activities and the development of international information technology standards.
(b) "Information Technology" has the meaning given that term in section 5002 of the Information Technology Act [
(c) "Information resources" has the meaning given that term in
(d) "Information resources management" has the meaning given that term in
(e) "Information system" has the meaning given that term in
(f) "Affinity group" means any interagency group focussed on a business or technology area with common information technology or customer requirements. The functions of an affinity group can include identifying common program goals and requirements; identifying opportunities for sharing information to improve quality and effectiveness; reducing costs and burden on the public; and recommending protocols and other standards, including security standards, to the National Institute of Standards and Technology for Governmentwide applicability, for action in accordance with the Computer Security Act of 1987 [
(g) "National security system" means any telecommunications or information system operated by the United States Government, the function, operation, or use of which (1) involves intelligence activities; (2) involves cryptologic activities related to national security; (3) involves command and control of military forces; (4) involves equipment that is an integral part of a weapon or weapons system; or (5) is critical to the direct fulfillment of military or intelligence missions, but excluding any system that is to be used for routine administrative and business applications (including payroll, finance, logistics, and personnel management applications).
The heads of executive agencies shall apply the policies and procedures established in this order to national security systems in a manner consistent with the applicability and related limitations regarding such systems set out in the Information Technology Act.
William J. Clinton.
Ex. Ord. No. 13103. Computer Software Piracy
Ex. Ord. No. 13103, Sept. 30, 1998, 63 F.R. 53273, provided:
The United States Government is the world's largest purchaser of computer-related services and equipment, purchasing more than $20 billion annually. At a time when a critical component in discussions with our international trading partners concerns their efforts to combat piracy of computer software and other intellectual property, it is incumbent on the United States to ensure that its own practices as a purchaser and user of computer software are beyond reproach. Accordingly, by the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows:
(a) Each agency shall adopt procedures to ensure that the agency does not acquire, reproduce, distribute, or transmit computer software in violation of applicable copyright laws.
(b) Each agency shall establish procedures to ensure that the agency has present on its computers and uses only computer software not in violation of applicable copyright laws. These procedures may include:
(1) preparing agency inventories of the software present on its computers;
(2) determining what computer software the agency has the authorization to use; and
(3) developing and maintaining adequate recordkeeping systems.
(c) Contractors and recipients of Federal financial assistance, including recipients of grants and loan guarantee assistance, should have appropriate systems and controls in place to ensure that Federal funds are not used to acquire, operate, or maintain computer software in violation of applicable copyright laws. If agencies become aware that contractors or recipients are using Federal funds to acquire, operate, or maintain computer software in violation of copyright laws and determine that such actions of the contractors or recipients may affect the integrity of the agency's contracting and Federal financial assistance processes, agencies shall take such measures, including the use of certifications or written assurances, as the agency head deems appropriate and consistent with the requirements of law.
(d) Executive agencies shall cooperate fully in implementing this order and shall share information as appropriate that may be useful in combating the use of computer software in violation of applicable copyright laws.
(a) ensure agency compliance with copyright laws protecting computer software and with the provisions of this order to ensure that only authorized computer software is acquired for and used on the agency's computers;
(b) utilize performance measures as recommended by the Chief Information Officers Council pursuant to section 3 of this order to assess the agency's compliance with this order;
(c) educate appropriate agency personnel regarding copyrights protecting computer software and the policies and procedures adopted by the agency to honor them; and
(d) ensure that the policies, procedures, and practices of the agency related to copyrights protecting computer software are adequate and fully implement the policies set forth in this order.
William J. Clinton.
Section Referred to in Other Sections
This section is referred to in title 10 section 2223; title 29 section 794d; title 44 section 3502.
SUBCHAPTER I—RESPONSIBILITY FOR ACQUISITIONS OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Part A—Director of Office of Management and Budget
§1411. Responsibility of Director
In fulfilling the responsibility to administer the functions assigned under
(
References in Text
This subchapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this title" meaning title LI (§§5101–5142) of div. E of
Effective Date
Subchapter effective 180 days after Feb. 10, 1996, see section 5701 of
Review and Analysis of Outsourcing and Privatization
"(1) the Director of the Office of Management and Budget and the heads of the executive agencies may have studies, analyses, reviews and other management assistance performed by the private sector;
"(2) the reviews, analyses, and studies called for by
"(3) in accordance with principles and rules governing organizational conflicts of interest, persons involved in a particular study may not compete for any work that is to be or is outsourced as a result of that study; and
"(4) this section will apply with respect to studies occurring on or after the date of enactment of this subsection [Sept. 30, 1996] and completed before September 1, 1999 and the Comptroller General of the United States shall review and provide an assessment of this program by January 1, 1999."
§1412. Capital planning and investment control
(a) Federal information technology
The Director shall perform the responsibilities set forth in this section in fulfilling the responsibilities under
(b) Use of information technology in Federal programs
The Director shall promote and be responsible for improving the acquisition, use, and disposal of information technology by the Federal Government to improve the productivity, efficiency, and effectiveness of Federal programs, including through dissemination of public information and the reduction of information collection burdens on the public.
(c) Use of budget process
The Director shall develop, as part of the budget process, a process for analyzing, tracking, and evaluating the risks and results of all major capital investments made by an executive agency for information systems. The process shall cover the life of each system and shall include explicit criteria for analyzing the projected and actual costs, benefits, and risks associated with the investments. At the same time that the President submits the budget for a fiscal year to Congress under
(d) Information technology standards
The Director shall oversee the development and implementation of standards and guidelines pertaining to Federal computer systems by the Secretary of Commerce through the National Institute of Standards and Technology under
(e) Designation of executive agents for acquisitions
The Director shall designate (as the Director considers appropriate) one or more heads of executive agencies as executive agent for Government-wide acquisitions of information technology.
(f) Use of best practices in acquisitions
The Director shall encourage the heads of the executive agencies to develop and use the best practices in the acquisition of information technology.
(g) Assessment of other models for managing information technology
The Director shall assess, on a continuing basis, the experiences of executive agencies, State and local governments, international organizations, and the private sector in managing information technology.
(h) Comparison of agency uses of information technology
The Director shall compare the performances of the executive agencies in using information technology and shall disseminate the comparisons to the heads of the executive agencies.
(i) Training
The Director shall monitor the development and implementation of training in information resources management for executive agency personnel.
(j) Informing Congress
The Director shall keep Congress fully informed on the extent to which the executive agencies are improving the performance of agency programs and the accomplishment of agency missions through the use of the best practices in information resources management.
(k) Procurement policy and acquisitions of information technology
The Director shall coordinate the development and review by the Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs of policy associated with Federal acquisition of information technology with the Office of Federal Procurement Policy.
(
Section Referred to in Other Sections
This section is referred to in
§1413. Performance-based and results-based management
(a) In general
The Director shall encourage the use of performance-based and results-based management in fulfilling the responsibilities assigned under section 3504(h),1 of title 44.
(b) Evaluation of agency programs and investments
(1) Requirement
The Director shall evaluate the information resources management practices of the executive agencies with respect to the performance and results of the investments made by the executive agencies in information technology.
(2) Direction for executive agency action
The Director shall issue to the head of each executive agency clear and concise direction that the head of such agency shall—
(A) establish effective and efficient capital planning processes for selecting, managing, and evaluating the results of all of its major investments in information systems;
(B) determine, before making an investment in a new information system—
(i) whether the function to be supported by the system should be performed by the private sector and, if so, whether any component of the executive agency performing that function should be converted from a governmental organization to a private sector organization; or
(ii) whether the function should be performed by the executive agency and, if so, whether the function should be performed by a private sector source under contract or by executive agency personnel;
(C) analyze the missions of the executive agency and, based on the analysis, revise the executive agency's mission-related processes and administrative processes, as appropriate, before making significant investments in information technology to be used in support of those missions; and
(D) ensure that the information security policies, procedures, and practices are adequate.
(3) Guidance for multiagency investments
The direction issued under paragraph (2) shall include guidance for undertaking efficiently and effectively interagency and Government-wide investments in information technology to improve the accomplishment of missions that are common to the executive agencies.
(4) Periodic reviews
The Director shall implement through the budget process periodic reviews of selected information resources management activities of the executive agencies in order to ascertain the efficiency and effectiveness of information technology in improving the performance of the executive agency and the accomplishment of the missions of the executive agency.
(5) Enforcement of accountability
(A) In general
The Director may take any authorized action that the Director considers appropriate, including an action involving the budgetary process or appropriations management process, to enforce accountability of the head of an executive agency for information resources management and for the investments made by the executive agency in information technology.
(B) Specific actions
Actions taken by the Director in the case of an executive agency may include—
(i) recommending a reduction or an increase in any amount for information resources that the head of the executive agency proposes for the budget submitted to Congress under
(ii) reducing or otherwise adjusting apportionments and reapportionments of appropriations for information resources;
(iii) using other authorized administrative controls over appropriations to restrict the availability of funds for information resources; and
(iv) designating for the executive agency an executive agent to contract with private sector sources for the performance of information resources management or the acquisition of information technology.
(
Section Referred to in Other Sections
This section is referred to in
1 So in original. The comma probably should not appear.
Part B—Executive Agencies
§1421. Responsibilities
In fulfilling the responsibilities assigned under
(
References in Text
This part, referred to in text, was in the original "this subtitle" meaning subtitle C (§§5121–5128) of title LI of div. E of
Procurement of Automatic Data Processing Equipment for Tax Systems Modernization Program; Delegation of Authority
§1422. Capital planning and investment control
(a) Design of process
In fulfilling the responsibilities assigned under
(b) Content of process
The process of an executive agency shall—
(1) provide for the selection of information technology investments to be made by the executive agency, the management of such investments, and the evaluation of the results of such investments;
(2) be integrated with the processes for making budget, financial, and program management decisions within the executive agency;
(3) include minimum criteria to be applied in considering whether to undertake a particular investment in information systems, including criteria related to the quantitatively expressed projected net, risk-adjusted return on investment and specific quantitative and qualitative criteria for comparing and prioritizing alternative information systems investment projects;
(4) provide for identifying information systems investments that would result in shared benefits or costs for other Federal agencies or State or local governments;
(5) provide for identifying for a proposed investment quantifiable measurements for determining the net benefits and risks of the investment; and
(6) provide the means for senior management personnel of the executive agency to obtain timely information regarding the progress of an investment in an information system, including a system of milestones for measuring progress, on an independently verifiable basis, in terms of cost, capability of the system to meet specified requirements, timeliness, and quality.
(
Section Referred to in Other Sections
This section is referred to in
§1423. Performance and results-based management
In fulfilling the responsibilities under
(1) establish goals for improving the efficiency and effectiveness of agency operations and, as appropriate, the delivery of services to the public through the effective use of information technology;
(2) prepare an annual report, to be included in the executive agency's budget submission to Congress, on the progress in achieving the goals;
(3) ensure that performance measurements are prescribed for information technology used by or to be acquired for, the executive agency and that the performance measurements measure how well the information technology supports programs of the executive agency;
(4) where comparable processes and organizations in the public or private sectors exist, quantitatively benchmark agency process performance against such processes in terms of cost, speed, productivity, and quality of outputs and outcomes;
(5) analyze the missions of the executive agency and, based on the analysis, revise the executive agency's mission-related processes and administrative processes as appropriate before making significant investments in information technology that is to be used in support of the performance of those missions; and
(6) ensure that the information security policies, procedures, and practices of the executive agency are adequate.
(
Section Referred to in Other Sections
This section is referred to in
§1424. Acquisitions of information technology
(a) In general
The authority of the head of an executive agency to conduct an acquisition of information technology includes the following authorities:
(1) To acquire information technology as authorized by law.
(2) To enter into a contract that provides for multiagency acquisitions of information technology in accordance with guidance issued by the Director.
(3) If the Director finds that it would be advantageous for the Federal Government to do so, to enter into a multiagency contract for procurement of commercial items of information technology that requires each executive agency covered by the contract, when procuring such items, either to procure the items under that contract or to justify an alternative procurement of the items.
(b) FTS 2000 program
Notwithstanding any other provision of this or any other law, the Administrator of General Services shall continue to manage the FTS 2000 program, and to coordinate the follow-on to that program, on behalf of and with the advice of the heads of executive agencies.
(
§1425. Agency Chief Information Officer
(a) Omitted
(b) General responsibilities
The Chief Information Officer of an executive agency shall be responsible for—
(1) providing advice and other assistance to the head of the executive agency and other senior management personnel of the executive agency to ensure that information technology is acquired and information resources are managed for the executive agency in a manner that implements the policies and procedures of this chapter, consistent with
(2) developing, maintaining, and facilitating the implementation of a sound and integrated information technology architecture for the executive agency; and
(3) promoting the effective and efficient design and operation of all major information resources management processes for the executive agency, including improvements to work processes of the executive agency.
(c) Duties and qualifications
The Chief Information Officer of an agency that is listed in
(1) have information resources management duties as that official's primary duty;
(2) monitor the performance of information technology programs of the agency, evaluate the performance of those programs on the basis of the applicable performance measurements, and advise the head of the agency regarding whether to continue, modify, or terminate a program or project; and
(3) annually, as part of the strategic planning and performance evaluation process required (subject to
(A) assess the requirements established for agency personnel regarding knowledge and skill in information resources management and the adequacy of such requirements for facilitating the achievement of the performance goals established for information resources management;
(B) assess the extent to which the positions and personnel at the executive level of the agency and the positions and personnel at management level of the agency below the executive level meet those requirements;
(C) in order to rectify any deficiency in meeting those requirements, develop strategies and specific plans for hiring, training, and professional development; and
(D) report to the head of the agency on the progress made in improving information resources management capability.
(d) "Information technology architecture" defined
In this section, the term "information technology architecture", with respect to an executive agency, means an integrated framework for evolving or maintaining existing information technology and acquiring new information technology to achieve the agency's strategic goals and information resources management goals.
(
References in Text
This chapter, referred to in subsec. (b)(1), was in the original "this division" meaning division E (§§5001–5703) of
Codification
Section is comprised of section 5125 of
Section Referred to in Other Sections
This section is referred to in
1 See References in Text note below.
§1426. Accountability
The head of each executive agency, in consultation with the Chief Information Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of that executive agency (or, in the case of an executive agency without a Chief Financial Officer, any comparable official), shall establish policies and procedures that—
(1) ensure that the accounting, financial, and asset management systems and other information systems of the executive agency are designed, developed, maintained, and used effectively to provide financial or program performance data for financial statements of the executive agency;
(2) ensure that financial and related program performance data are provided on a reliable, consistent, and timely basis to executive agency financial management systems; and
(3) ensure that financial statements support—
(A) assessments and revisions of mission-related processes and administrative processes of the executive agency; and
(B) performance measurement of the performance in the case of investments made by the agency in information systems.
(
Section Referred to in Other Sections
This section is referred to in
§1427. Significant deviations
The head of an executive agency shall identify in the strategic information resources management plan required under
(
§1428. Interagency support
Funds available for an executive agency for oversight, acquisition, and procurement of information technology may be used by the head of the executive agency to support jointly with other executive agencies the activities of interagency groups that are established to advise the Director in carrying out the Director's responsibilities under this subchapter. The use of such funds for that purpose shall be subject to such requirements and limitations on uses and amounts as the Director may prescribe. The Director shall prescribe any such requirements and limitations during the Director's review of the executive agency's proposed budget submitted to the Director by the head of the executive agency for purposes of
(
References in Text
This subchapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this title" meaning title LI (§§5101–5142) of div. E of
Part C—Other Responsibilities
§1441. Responsibilities regarding efficiency, security, and privacy of Federal computer systems
(a) Standards and guidelines
(1) Authority
The Secretary of Commerce shall, on the basis of standards and guidelines developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology pursuant to paragraphs (2) and (3) of
(2) Exercise of authority
The authority conferred upon the Secretary of Commerce by this section shall be exercised subject to direction by the President and in coordination with the Director to ensure fiscal and policy consistency.
(b) Application of more stringent standards
The head of a Federal agency may employ standards for the cost-effective security and privacy of sensitive information in a Federal computer system within or under the supervision of that agency that are more stringent than the standards promulgated by the Secretary of Commerce under this section, if such standards contain, at a minimum, the provisions of those applicable standards made compulsory and binding by the Secretary of Commerce.
(c) Waiver of standards
The standards determined under subsection (a) of this section to be compulsory and binding may be waived by the Secretary of Commerce in writing upon a determination that compliance would adversely affect the accomplishment of the mission of an operator of a Federal computer system, or cause a major adverse financial impact on the operator which is not offset by Government-wide savings. The Secretary may delegate to the head of one or more Federal agencies authority to waive such standards to the extent to which the Secretary determines such action to be necessary and desirable to allow for timely and effective implementation of Federal computer system standards. The head of such agency may redelegate such authority only to a Chief Information Officer designated pursuant to
(d) Definitions
In this section, the terms "Federal computer system" and "operator of a Federal computer system" have the meanings given such terms in
(
Codification
Section is comprised of section 5131 of
Computer Security
"SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
"This Act [enacting
"SEC. 2. PURPOSE.
"(a)
"(b)
"(1) by amending the Act of March 3, 1901 [
"(2) to provide for promulgation of such standards and guidelines;
"(3) to require establishment of security plans by all operators of Federal computer systems that contain sensitive information; and
"(4) to require mandatory periodic training for all persons involved in management, use, or operation of Federal computer systems that contain sensitive information.
"SEC. 5. FEDERAL COMPUTER SYSTEM SECURITY TRAINING.
"(a)
"(1) provided in accordance with the guidelines developed pursuant to section 20(a)(5) of the National Bureau of Standards Act (as added by section 3 of this Act) [
"(2) provided by an alternative training program approved by the head of that agency on the basis of a determination that the alternative training program is at least as effective in accomplishing the objectives of such guidelines and regulations.
"(b)
"(1) to enhance employees' awareness of the threats to and vulnerability of computer systems; and
"(2) to encourage the use of improved computer security practices.
"(c)
"SEC. 6. ADDITIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES FOR COMPUTER SYSTEMS SECURITY AND PRIVACY.
"(a)
"(b)
"SEC. 7. DEFINITIONS.
"As used in this Act, the terms 'computer system', 'Federal computer system', 'operator of a Federal computer system', 'sensitive information', and 'Federal agency' have the meanings given in section 20(d) of the National Bureau of Standards Act (as added by section 3 of this Act) [
"SEC. 8. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION OF ACT.
"Nothing in this Act, or in any amendment made by this Act, shall be construed—
"(1) to constitute authority to withhold information sought pursuant to
"(2) to authorize any Federal agency to limit, restrict, regulate, or control the collection, maintenance, disclosure, use, transfer, or sale of any information (regardless of the medium in which the information may be maintained) that is—
"(A) privately-owned information;
"(B) disclosable under
"(C) public domain information."
Section Referred to in Other Sections
This section is referred to in
§1442. Sense of Congress
It is the sense of Congress that, during the next five-year period beginning with 1996, executive agencies should achieve each year at least a 5 percent decrease in the cost (in constant fiscal year 1996 dollars) that is incurred by the agency for operating and maintaining information technology, and each year a 5 percent increase in the efficiency of the agency operations, by reason of improvements in information resources management by the agency.
(
Part D—National Security Systems
§1451. Applicability to national security systems
(a) In general
Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, this subchapter does not apply to national security systems.
(b) Exceptions
(1) In general
(2) Capital planning and investment control
The heads of executive agencies shall apply
(3) Performance and results of information technology investments
(A) Subject to subparagraph (B), the heads of executive agencies shall apply
(B) National security systems shall be subject to
(
References in Text
This subchapter, referred to in subsec. (a), was in the original "this title" meaning title LI (§§5101–5142) of div. E of
§1452. "National security system" defined
(a) Definition
In this part, the term "national security system" means any telecommunications or information system operated by the United States Government, the function, operation, or use of which—
(1) involves intelligence activities;
(2) involves cryptologic activities related to national security;
(3) involves command and control of military forces;
(4) involves equipment that is an integral part of a weapon or weapons system; or
(5) subject to subsection (b) of this section, is critical to the direct fulfillment of military or intelligence missions.
(b) Limitation
Subsection (a)(5) of this section does not include a system that is to be used for routine administrative and business applications (including payroll, finance, logistics, and personnel management applications).
(
Section Referred to in Other Sections
This section is referred to in title 10 section 2223; title 29 section 794d; title 44 section 3502.
SUBCHAPTER II—PROCESS FOR ACQUISITIONS OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
§1461. Procurement procedures
The Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council shall ensure that, to the maximum extent practicable, the process for acquisition of information technology is a simplified, clear, and understandable process that specifically addresses the management of risk, incremental acquisitions, and the need to incorporate commercial information technology in a timely manner.
(
Effective Date
Subchapter effective 180 days after Feb. 10, 1996, see section 5701 of
SUBCHAPTER III—INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACQUISITION PILOT PROGRAMS
Part A—Conduct of Pilot Programs
§1471. Authority to conduct pilot programs
(a) In general
(1) Purpose
The Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy (hereinafter referred to as the "Administrator"), in consultation with the Administrator for the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, may conduct pilot programs in order to test alternative approaches for acquisition of information technology by executive agencies.
(2) Multiagency, multi-activity conduct of each program
Except as otherwise provided in this subchapter, each pilot program conducted under this subchapter shall be carried out in not more than two procuring activities in each of the executive agencies that are designated by the Administrator in accordance with this subchapter to carry out the pilot program. The head of each designated executive agency shall, with the approval of the Administrator, select the procuring activities of the executive agency that are to participate in the test and shall designate a procurement testing official who shall be responsible for the conduct and evaluation of the pilot program within the executive agency.
(b) Limitations
(1) Number
Not more than two pilot programs may be conducted under the authority of this subchapter, including one pilot program each pursuant to the requirements of
(2) Amount
The total amount obligated for contracts entered into under the pilot programs conducted under the authority of this subchapter may not exceed $750,000,000. The Administrator shall monitor such contracts and ensure that contracts are not entered into in violation of the limitation in the preceding sentence.
(c) Period of programs
(1) In general
Subject to paragraph (2), any pilot program may be carried out under this subchapter for the period, not in excess of five years, that is determined by the Administrator as being sufficient to establish reliable results.
(2) Continuing validity of contracts
A contract entered into under the pilot program before the expiration of that program shall remain in effect according to the terms of the contract after the expiration of the program.
(
Effective Date
Subchapter effective 180 days after Feb. 10, 1996, see section 5701 of
Section Referred to in Other Sections
This section is referred to in
§1472. Evaluation criteria and plans
(a) Measurable test criteria
The head of each executive agency conducting a pilot program under
(b) Test plan
Before a pilot program may be conducted under
(
§1473. Report
(a) Requirement
Not later than 180 days after the completion of a pilot program under this subchapter, the Administrator shall—
(1) submit to the Director a report on the results and findings under the program; and
(2) provide a copy of the report to Congress.
(b) Content
The report shall include the following:
(1) A detailed description of the results of the program, as measured by the criteria established for the program.
(2) A discussion of any legislation that the Administrator recommends, or changes in regulations that the Administrator considers necessary, in order to improve overall information resources management within the Federal Government.
(
§1474. Recommended legislation
If the Director determines that the results and findings under a pilot program under this subchapter indicate that legislation is necessary or desirable in order to improve the process for acquisition of information technology, the Director shall transmit the Director's recommendations for such legislation to Congress.
(
§1475. Rule of construction
Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed as authorizing the appropriation or obligation of funds for the pilot programs authorized under this subchapter.
(
Part B—Specific Pilot Programs
§1491. Share-in-savings pilot program
(a) Requirement
The Administrator may authorize the heads of two executive agencies to carry out a pilot program to test the feasibility of—
(1) contracting on a competitive basis with a private sector source to provide the Federal Government with an information technology solution for improving mission-related or administrative processes of the Federal Government; and
(2) paying the private sector source an amount equal to a portion of the savings derived by the Federal Government from any improvements in mission-related processes and administrative processes that result from implementation of the solution.
(b) Limitations
The head of an executive agency authorized to carry out the pilot program may, under the pilot program, carry out one project and enter into not more than five contracts for the project.
(c) Selection of projects
The projects shall be selected by the Administrator, in consultation with the Administrator for the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs.
(
Section Referred to in Other Sections
This section is referred to in
§1492. Solutions-based contracting pilot program
(a) In general
The Administrator may authorize the heads of any of the executive agencies, in accordance with subsection (d)(2) of this section, to carry out a pilot program to test the feasibility of using solutions-based contracting for acquisition of information technology.
(b) Solutions-based contracting described
For purposes of this section, solutions-based contracting is an acquisition method under which the acquisition objectives are defined by the Federal Government user of the technology to be acquired, a streamlined contractor selection process is used, and industry sources are allowed to provide solutions that attain the objectives effectively.
(c) Process requirements
The Administrator shall require use of a process with the following aspects for acquisitions under the pilot program:
(1) Acquisition plan emphasizing desired result
Preparation of an acquisition plan that defines the functional requirements of the intended users of the information technology to be acquired, identifies the operational improvements to be achieved, and defines the performance measurements to be applied in determining whether the information technology acquired satisfies the defined requirements and attains the identified results.
(2) Results-oriented statement of work
Use of a statement of work that is limited to an expression of the end results or performance capabilities desired under the acquisition plan.
(3) Small acquisition organization
Assembly of a small acquisition organization consisting of the following:
(A) An acquisition management team, the members of which are to be evaluated and rewarded under the pilot program for contributions toward attainment of the desired results identified in the acquisition plan.
(B) A small source selection team composed of representatives of the specific mission or administrative area to be supported by the information technology to be acquired, together with a contracting officer and persons with relevant expertise.
(4) Use of source selection factors emphasizing source qualifications and costs
Use of source selection factors that emphasize—
(A) the qualifications of the offeror, including such factors as personnel skills, previous experience in providing other private or public sector organizations with solutions for attaining objectives similar to the objectives of the acquisition, past contract performance, qualifications of the proposed program manager, and the proposed management plan; and
(B) the costs likely to be associated with the conceptual approach proposed by the offeror.
(5) Open communications with contractor community
Open availability of the following information to potential offerors:
(A) The agency mission to be served by the acquisition.
(B) The functional process to be performed by use of information technology.
(C) The process improvements to be attained.
(6) Simple solicitation
Use of a simple solicitation that sets forth only the functional work description, the source selection factors to be used in accordance with paragraph (4), the required terms and conditions, instructions regarding submission of offers, and the estimate of the Federal Government's budget for the desired work.
(7) Simple proposals
Submission of oral presentations and written proposals that are limited in size and scope and contain information on—
(A) the offeror's qualifications to perform the desired work;
(B) past contract performance;
(C) the proposed conceptual approach; and
(D) the costs likely to be associated with the proposed conceptual approach.
(8) Simple evaluation
Use of a simplified evaluation process, to be completed within 45 days after receipt of proposals, which consists of the following:
(A) Identification of the most qualified offerors that are within the competitive range.
(B) Issuance of invitations for at least three and not more than five of the identified offerors to make oral presentations to, and engage in discussions with, the evaluating personnel regarding, for each offeror—
(i) the qualifications of the offeror, including how the qualifications of the offeror relate to the approach proposed to be taken by the offeror in the acquisition; and
(ii) the costs likely to be associated with the approach.
(C) Evaluation of the qualifications of the identified offerors and the costs likely to be associated with the offerors' proposals on the basis of submissions required under the process and any oral presentations made by, and any discussions with, the offerors.
(9) Selection of most qualified offeror
A selection process consisting of the following:
(A) Identification of the most qualified source or sources, primarily on the basis of the oral proposals, presentations, and discussions, and written proposals submitted in accordance with paragraph (7).
(B) Conduct for 30 to 60 days (or a longer period, if approved by the Administrator) of a program definition phase (funded, in the case of the source ultimately awarded the contract, by the Federal Government)—
(i) during which the selected source or sources, in consultation with one or more intended users, develops a conceptual system design and technical approach, defines logical phases for the project, and estimates the total cost and the cost for each phase; and
(ii) after which a contract for performance of the work may be awarded to the source whose offer is determined to be most advantageous to the Government on the basis of cost, the responsiveness, reasonableness, and quality of the proposed performance, and a sharing of risk and benefits between the source and the Government.
(C) Conduct of as many successive program definition phases as is necessary in order to award a contract in accordance with subparagraph (B).
(10) System implementation phasing
System implementation to be executed in phases that are tailored to the solution, with various contract arrangements being used, as appropriate, for various phases and activities.
(11) Mutual authority to terminate
Authority for the Federal Government or the contractor to terminate the contract without penalty at the end of any phase defined for the project.
(12) Time management discipline
Application of a standard for awarding a contract within 105 to 120 days after issuance of the solicitation, except that the Administrator may approve the application of a longer standard period.
(d) Pilot program design
(1) Joint public-private working group
The Administrator, in consultation with the Administrator for the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, shall establish a joint working group of Federal Government personnel and representatives of the information technology industry to design a plan for conduct of any pilot program carried out under this section.
(2) Content of plan
The plan shall provide for use of solutions-based contracting in the Department of Defense and not more than two other executive agencies for a total of—
(A) not more than 10 projects, each of which has an estimated cost of between $25,000,000 and $100,000,000; and
(B) not more than 10 projects, each of which has an estimated cost of between $1,000,000 and $5,000,000, to be set aside for small business concerns.
(3) Complexity of projects
(A) Subject to subparagraph (C), each acquisition project under the pilot program shall be sufficiently complex to provide for meaningful evaluation of the use of solutions-based contracting for acquisition of information technology for executive agencies.
(B) In order for an acquisition project to satisfy the requirement in subparagraph (A), the solution for attainment of the executive agency's objectives under the project should not be obvious, but rather shall involve a need for some innovative development and systems integration.
(C) An acquisition project should not be so extensive or lengthy as to result in undue delay in the evaluation of the use of solutions-based contracting.
(e) Monitoring by GAO
The Comptroller General of the United States shall—
(1) monitor the conduct, and review the results, of acquisitions under the pilot program; and
(2) submit to Congress periodic reports containing the views of the Comptroller General on the activities, results, and findings under the pilot program.
(
Amendments
1997—Subsec. (c)(9)(A).
Subsec. (c)(9)(B).
Subsec. (c)(9)(B)(i).
Subsec. (c)(9)(B)(ii).
Subsec. (c)(9)(C).
Subsec. (c)(12).
Section Referred to in Other Sections
This section is referred to in
SUBCHAPTER IV—ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT MATTERS
§1501. On-line multiple award schedule contracting
(a) Automation of multiple award schedule contracting
In order to provide for the economic and efficient procurement of information technology and other commercial items, the Administrator of General Services shall provide, not later than January 1, 1998, Government-wide on-line computer access to information on products and services that are available for ordering under the multiple award schedules.
(b) Functions
(1) The system for providing on-line computer access shall have the capability to perform the following functions:
(A) Provide basic information on prices, features, and performance of all products and services available for ordering through the multiple award schedules.
(B) Provide for updating that information to reflect changes in prices, features, and performance as soon as information on the changes becomes available.
(C) Enable users to make on-line computer comparisons of the prices, features, and performance of similar products and services offered by various vendors.
(2) The system for providing on-line computer access shall be used to place orders under the multiple award schedules in a fiscal year for an amount equal to at least 60 percent of the total amount spent for all orders under the multiple award schedules in that fiscal year.
(c) Streamlined procedures
(1) Pilot program
Upon certification by the Administrator of General Services that the system for providing on-line computer access meets the requirements of subsection (b)(1) of this section and was used as required by subsection (b)(2) of this section in the fiscal year preceding the fiscal year in which the certification is made, the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy may establish a pilot program to test streamlined procedures for the procurement of information technology products and services available for ordering through the multiple award schedules.
(2) Applicability to multiple award schedule contracts
Except as provided in paragraph (4), the pilot program shall be applicable to all multiple award schedule contracts for the purchase of information technology and shall test the following procedures:
(A) A procedure under which negotiation of the terms and conditions for a covered multiple award schedule contract is limited to terms and conditions other than price.
(B) A procedure under which the vendor establishes the prices under a covered multiple award schedule contract and may adjust those prices at any time in the discretion of the vendor.
(C) A procedure under which a covered multiple award schedule contract is awarded to any responsible offeror that—
(i) has a suitable record of past performance, which may include past performance on multiple award schedule contracts;
(ii) agrees to terms and conditions that the Administrator determines as being required by law or as being appropriate for the purchase of commercial items; and
(iii) agrees to establish and update prices, features, and performance and to accept orders electronically through the automated system established pursuant to subsection (a) of this section.
(3) Comptroller General review and report
(A) Not later than three years after the date on which the pilot program is established, the Comptroller General of the United States shall review the pilot program and report to the Congress on the results of the pilot program.
(B) The report shall include the following:
(i) An evaluation of the extent to which there is competition for the orders placed under the pilot program.
(ii) The effect that the streamlined procedures under the pilot program have on prices charged under multiple award schedule contracts.
(iii) The effect that such procedures have on paperwork requirements for multiple award schedule contracts and orders.
(iv) The impact of the pilot program on small businesses and socially and economically disadvantaged small businesses.
(4) Withdrawal of schedule or portion of schedule from pilot program
The Administrator may withdraw a multiple award schedule or portion of a schedule from the pilot program if the Administrator determines that (A) price competition is not available under such schedule or portion thereof, or (B) the cost to the Government for that schedule or portion thereof for the previous year was higher than it would have been if the contracts for such schedule or portion thereof had been awarded using procedures that would apply if the pilot program were not in effect. The Administrator shall notify Congress at least 30 days before the date on which the Administrator withdraws a schedule or portion thereof under this paragraph. The authority under this paragraph may not be delegated.
(5) Termination of pilot program
Unless reauthorized by law, the authority of the Administrator to award contracts under the pilot program shall expire four years after the date on which the pilot program is established. Contracts entered into before the authority expires shall remain in effect in accordance with their terms notwithstanding the expiration of the authority to award new contracts under the pilot program.
(
Amendments
1997—Subsec. (a).
Subsec. (b).
Subsec. (c)(1).
Subsec. (d).
Effective Date of 1997 Amendment
Amendment by
Effective Date
Subchapter effective 180 days after Feb. 10, 1996, see section 5701 of
§1502. Identification of excess and surplus computer equipment
Not later than six months after February 10, 1996, the head of an executive agency shall inventory all computer equipment under the control of that official. After completion of the inventory, the head of the executive agency shall maintain, in accordance with title II of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (
(
References in Text
The Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949, referred to in text, is act June 30, 1949, ch. 288,
§1503. Access of certain information in information systems to directory established under section 4101 of title 44
Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, if in designing an information technology system pursuant to this chapter, the head of an executive agency determines that a purpose of the system is to disseminate information to the public, then the head of such executive agency shall reasonably ensure that an index of information disseminated by such system is included in the directory created pursuant to
(
References in Text
This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this division" meaning division E (§§5001–5703) of