10 USC 2207: Expenditure of appropriations: limitation
Result 1 of 1
   
 
10 USC 2207: Expenditure of appropriations: limitation Text contains those laws in effect on January 4, 1995
From Title 10-ARMED FORCESSubtitle A-General Military LawPART IV-SERVICE, SUPPLY, AND PROCUREMENTCHAPTER 131-PLANNING AND COORDINATION
Jump To: Source Credit

§2207 . Expenditure of appropriations: limitation

Money appropriated to the Department of Defense may not be spent under a contract other than a contract for personal services unless that contract provides that-

(1) the United States may, by written notice to the contractor, terminate the right of the contractor to proceed under the contract if the Secretary concerned or his designee finds, after notice and hearing, that the contractor, or his agent or other representative, offered or gave any gratuity, such as entertainment or a gift, to an officer, official, or employee of the United States to obtain a contract or favorable treatment in the awarding, amending, or making of determinations concerning the performance, of a contract; and

(2) if a contract is terminated under clause (1), the United States has the same remedies against the contractor that it would have had if the contractor had breached the contract and, in addition to other damages, is entitled to exemplary damages in an amount at least three, but not more than 10, as determined by the Secretary or his designee, times the cost incurred by the contractor in giving gratuities to the officer, official, or employee concerned.


The existence of facts upon which the Secretary makes findings under clause (1) may be reviewed by any competent court.

(Added Pub. L. 87–651, title II, §207(a), Sept. 7, 1962, 76 Stat. 520 .)

Historical and Revision Notes
Revised sectionSource (U.S. Code)Source (Statutes at Large)
2207 5:174d. June 30, 1954, ch. 432, §719, 68 Stat. 353 .

The following substitutions are made: "spent" for "expended"; "United States" for "Government"; "if a contract is terminated under clause (1)" for "that in the event any such contract is so terminated"; and "has . . . that it would have had if" for "shall be entitled . . . to pursue . . . as it could pursue in the event of". The word "official" is inserted for clarity. The words "entered into after June 30, 1954" are omitted as executed.

Section Referred to in Other Sections

This section is referred to in section 2343 of this title.