ATTACHMENT 1
Result 1 of 1
   
 
ATTACHMENT 1
From Title 10-AppendixCOURTS OF MILITARY REVIEW

ATTACHMENT 1

FORMAT FOR DIRECTION FOR REVIEW

in the united states army* court of military review
  
UNITED STATES
v. direction for review
Private (E–1) JOHN Case No. ________
RICHARD DOE, SSN Tried at________,
000–00–0000, on__________
Company, 300th before a G.C.M.
Infantry Division, APO appointed by
New York 09000. __________________.

to the honorable, the judges of the united states army* court of military review

1. Pursuant to the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 69, and the Rules of Practice and Procedure for Courts of Military Review, Rule 2b, the record of trial in the above-entitled case is forwarded for review pursuant to the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 66.

2. The accused was found guilty of a violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article(s) ________, was sentenced to ________ on ________ at ________ by ____. The convening authority (approved the sentence) (approved only so much of the sentence as provided for ______) and the case was received in the United States Army* Judiciary on ________.

3. In review pursuant to Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 66, it is requested that attention be given to the following issues:


A. WHETHER THE SPECIFICATION OF CHARGE I FAILS TO STATE AN OFFENSE UNDER THE UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE IN THAT IT DOES NOT ALLEGE THAT ACCUSED'S ABSENCE WAS WITHOUT AUTHORITY.

B. WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE FAILED TO TAILOR HIS INSTRUCTIONS ON SENTENCE TO THE MATTERS PRESENTED IN EXTENUATION AND MITIGATION.

JOHN H. BROWN

Major General, USA

The Judge Advocate General


Received a copy of the foregoing Direction for Review this ____ day of ________ 19____.

ROBERT JONES

Colonel, JAGC

Chief, Government Appellate

Division

HARRY ARNOLD

Colonel, JAGC

Chief, Defense Appellate

Division

JOHN C. SMITH, Esq.

1 Ace Street

Union, New Jersey 07083


* Use Navy-Marine Corps, Air Force, or Coast Guard as the case may be.