SUBCHAPTER IV—DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP MATTERS
Editorial Notes
Codification
Part A—Defense Environmental Cleanup
Editorial Notes
Codification
§2581. Defense Environmental Cleanup Account
(a) Establishment
There is hereby established in the Treasury of the United States for the Department of Energy an account to be known as the "Defense Environmental Cleanup Account" (hereafter in this section referred to as the "Account").
(b) Amounts in Account
All sums appropriated to the Department of Energy for defense environmental cleanup at defense nuclear facilities shall be credited to the Account. Such appropriations shall be authorized annually by law. To the extent provided in appropriations Acts, amounts in the Account shall remain available until expended.
(
Editorial Notes
Codification
Section was formerly classified to
Amendments
2013—
Subsec. (a).
Subsec. (b).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Classification of Defense Environmental Cleanup as Capital Asset Projects or Operations Activities
"(a)
"(b)
"(1) setting forth the requirements established under subsection (a); and
"(2) assessing whether any ongoing defense environmental cleanup projects should be reclassified based on those requirements."
§2582. Requirement to develop future use plans for defense environmental cleanup
(a) Authority to develop future use plans
The Secretary of Energy may develop future use plans for any defense nuclear facility at which defense environmental cleanup activities are occurring.
(b) Requirement to develop future use plans
The Secretary shall develop a future use plan for each of the following defense nuclear facilities:
(1) Hanford Site, Richland, Washington.
(2) Savannah River Site, Aiken, South Carolina.
(3) Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, Idaho.
(c) Citizen advisory board
(1) At each defense nuclear facility for which the Secretary of Energy intends or is required to develop a future use plan under this section and for which no citizen advisory board has been established, the Secretary shall establish a citizen advisory board.
(2) The Secretary may authorize the manager of a defense nuclear facility for which a future use plan is developed under this section (or, if there is no such manager, an appropriate official of the Department of Energy designated by the Secretary) to pay routine administrative expenses of a citizen advisory board established for that facility. Such payments shall be made from funds available to the Secretary for defense environmental cleanup activities necessary for national security programs.
(d) Requirement to consult with citizen advisory board
In developing a future use plan under this section with respect to a defense nuclear facility, the Secretary of Energy shall consult with a citizen advisory board established pursuant to subsection (c) or a similar advisory board already in existence as of September 23, 1996, for such facility, affected local governments (including any local future use redevelopment authorities), and other appropriate State agencies.
(e) 50-year planning period
A future use plan developed under this section shall cover a period of at least 50 years.
(f) Report
Not later than 60 days after completing development of a final plan for a site listed in subsection (b), the Secretary of Energy shall submit to Congress a report on the plan. The report shall describe the plan and contain such findings and recommendations with respect to the site as the Secretary considers appropriate.
(g) Savings provisions
(1) Nothing in this section, or in a future use plan developed under this section with respect to a defense nuclear facility, shall be construed as requiring any modification to a future use plan with respect to a defense nuclear facility that was developed before September 23, 1996.
(2) Nothing in this section may be construed to affect statutory requirements for a defense environmental cleanup activity or project or to modify or otherwise affect applicable statutory or regulatory defense environmental cleanup requirements, including substantive standards intended to protect public health and the environment, nor shall anything in this section be construed to preempt or impair any local land use planning or zoning authority or State authority.
(
Editorial Notes
Codification
Section was formerly set out as a note under
Amendments
2013—
Subsec. (a).
Subsec. (b)(2) to (4).
Subsec. (c)(2).
Subsec. (f).
Subsec. (g).
Subsec. (g)(2).
Subsec. (h).
2003—Subsec. (d).
Subsec. (h)(1).
§2582a. Future-years defense environmental cleanup plan
(a) In general
The Secretary of Energy shall submit to Congress each year, at or about the same time that the President's budget is submitted to Congress for a fiscal year under
(1) reflects the estimated expenditures and proposed appropriations included in that budget for the Department of Energy for defense environmental cleanup; and
(2) covers a period that includes the fiscal year for which that budget is submitted and not less than the four succeeding fiscal years.
(b) Elements
Each future-years defense environmental cleanup plan required by subsection (a) shall contain the following:
(1) A detailed description of the projects and activities relating to defense environmental cleanup to be carried out during the period covered by the plan at the sites specified in subsection (c) and with respect to the activities specified in subsection (d).
(2) A statement of proposed budget authority, estimated expenditures, and proposed appropriations necessary to support such projects and activities.
(3) With respect to each site specified in subsection (c), the following:
(A) A statement of each milestone included in an enforceable agreement governing cleanup and waste remediation for that site for each fiscal year covered by the plan.
(B) For each such milestone, a statement with respect to whether each such milestone will be met in each such fiscal year.
(C) For any milestone that will not be met, an explanation of why the milestone will not be met and the date by which the milestone is expected to be met.
(D) For any milestone that has been missed, renegotiated, or postponed, a statement of the current milestone, the original milestone, and any interim milestones.
(c) Sites specified
The sites specified in this subsection are the following:
(1) The Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho.
(2) The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, Carlsbad, New Mexico.
(3) The Savannah River Site, Aiken, South Carolina.
(4) The Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
(5) The Hanford Site, Richland, Washington.
(6) Any defense closure site of the Department of Energy.
(7) Any site of the National Nuclear Security Administration.
(d) Activities specified
The activities specified in this subsection are the following:
(1) Program support.
(2) Program direction.
(3) Safeguards and security.
(4) Technology development and deployment.
(5) Federal contributions to the Uranium Enrichment Decontamination and Decommissioning Fund established under
(
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2021—Subsec. (b)(3)(D).
2013—
Subsec. (a).
Subsec. (a)(1).
Subsec. (b).
§2583. Repealed. Pub. L. 117–263, div. C, title XXXI, §3132(a)(1)(B)(i), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3060
Section,
§2584. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–66, div. C, title XXXI, §3146(e)(5), Dec. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 1076
Section,
§2585. Accelerated schedule for defense environmental cleanup activities
(a) Accelerated cleanup
The Secretary of Energy shall accelerate the schedule for defense environmental cleanup activities and disposition projects for a site at a Department of Energy defense nuclear facility if the Secretary determines that such an accelerated schedule will accelerate the recapitalization, modernization, or replacement of National Nuclear Security Administration facilities supporting the nuclear weapons stockpile, achieve meaningful, long-term cost savings to the Federal Government, or could substantially accelerate the release of land for local reuse without undermining national security objectives.
(b) Consideration of factors
In making a determination under subsection (a), the Secretary shall consider the following:
(1) The extent to which accelerated cleanup schedules can contribute to a more rapid modernization of National Nuclear Security Administration facilities.
(2) The cost savings achievable by the Federal Government.
(3) The potential for reuse of the site.
(4) The risks that the site poses to local health and safety.
(5) The proximity of the site to populated areas.
(c) Savings provision
Nothing in this section may be construed to affect a specific statutory requirement for a specific defense environmental cleanup activity or project or to modify or otherwise affect applicable statutory or regulatory defense environmental cleanup requirements, including substantive standards intended to protect public health and the environment.
(
Editorial Notes
Codification
Section was formerly set out as a note under
Amendments
2024—Subsec. (a).
Subsec. (b).
2013—
Subsec. (a).
Subsec. (b)(2) to (5).
Subsecs. (c), (d).
2003—Subsec. (b)(2).
§2586. Defense environmental cleanup technology program
(a) Establishment of program
The Secretary of Energy shall establish and carry out a program of research for the development of technologies useful for—
(1) the reduction of environmental hazards and contamination resulting from defense waste; and
(2) environmental restoration of inactive defense waste disposal sites.
(b) Definitions
As used in this section:
(1) The term "defense waste" means waste, including radioactive waste, resulting primarily from atomic energy defense activities of the Department of Energy.
(2) The term "inactive defense waste disposal site" means any site (including any facility) under the control or jurisdiction of the Secretary of Energy which is used for the disposal of defense waste and is closed to the disposal of additional defense waste, including any site that is subject to decontamination and decommissioning.
(
Editorial Notes
Codification
Section was formerly classified to
Amendments
2014—Subsec. (a).
2013—
Subsecs. (b), (c).
2003—
1997—Subsecs. (c), (d).
§2586a. Other programs relating to technology development
(a) Incremental Technology Development Program
(1) Establishment
The Secretary may establish a program, to be known as the "Incremental Technology Development Program", to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the defense environmental cleanup processes of the Office.
(2) Focus
(A) Improvements
In carrying out the Incremental Technology Development Program, the Secretary shall focus on the continuous improvement of new or available technologies, including—
(i) decontamination chemicals and techniques;
(ii) remote sensing and wireless communication to reduce manpower and laboratory efforts;
(iii) detection, assay, and certification instrumentation; and
(iv) packaging materials, methods, and shipping systems.
(B) Other areas
The Secretary may include in the Incremental Technology Development Program mission-relevant development, demonstration, and deployment activities unrelated to the focus areas described in subparagraph (A).
(3) Use of new and emerging technologies
(A) Development and demonstration
In carrying out the Incremental Technology Development Program, the Secretary shall ensure that site offices of the Office conduct technology development, demonstration, testing, permitting, and deployment of new and emerging technologies to establish a sound technical basis for the selection of technologies for defense environmental cleanup or infrastructure operations.
(B) Collaboration required
The Secretary shall collaborate, to the extent practicable, with the heads of other departments and agencies of the Federal Government, the National Laboratories, other Federal laboratories, appropriate State regulators and agencies, and the Department of Labor in the development, demonstration, testing, permitting, and deployment of new technologies under the Incremental Technology Development Program.
(4) Agreements to carry out projects
(A) Authority
In carrying out the Incremental Technology Development Program, the Secretary may enter into agreements with nongovernmental entities for technology development, demonstration, testing, permitting, and deployment projects to improve technologies in accordance with paragraph (2).
(B) Selection
The Secretary shall select projects under subparagraph (A) through a rigorous process that involves—
(i) transparent and open competition; and
(ii) a review process that, if practicable, is conducted in an independent manner consistent with Department guidance on selecting and funding public-private partnerships.
(C) Cost-sharing
The Federal share of the costs of the development, demonstration, testing, permitting, and deployment of new technologies carried out under this paragraph shall be not more than 70 percent.
(D) Briefing
Not later than 120 days before the date on which the Secretary enters into the first agreement under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on the process of selecting and funding efforts within the Incremental Technology Development Program, including with respect to the plans of the Secretary to ensure a scientifically rigorous process that minimizes potential conflicts of interest.
(b) High-Impact Technology Development Program
(1) Establishment
The Secretary shall establish a program, to be known as the "High-Impact Technology Development Program", under which the Secretary shall enter into agreements with nongovernmental entities for projects that pursue technologies that, with respect to the mission—
(A) holistically address difficult challenges;
(B) hold the promise of breakthrough improvements; or
(C) align existing or in-use technologies with difficult challenges.
(2) Areas of focus
The Secretary may include as areas of focus for a project carried out under the High-Impact Technology Development Program the following:
(A) Developing and demonstrating improved methods for source and plume characterization and monitoring, with an emphasis on—
(i) real-time field acquisition; and
(ii) the use of indicator species analyses with advanced contaminant transport models to enable better understanding of contaminant migration.
(B) Developing and determining the limits of performance for remediation technologies and integrated remedial systems that prevent migration of contaminants, including by producing associated guidance and design manuals for technologies that could be widely used across the complex.
(C) Demonstrating advanced monitoring approaches that use multiple lines of evidence for monitoring long-term performance of—
(i) remediation systems; and
(ii) noninvasive near-field monitoring techniques.
(D) Developing and demonstrating methods to characterize the physical and chemical attributes of waste that control behavior, with an emphasis on—
(i) rapid and nondestructive examination and assay techniques; and
(ii) methods to determine radio-nuclide, heavy metals, and organic constituents.
(E) Demonstrating the technical basis for determining when enhanced or natural attenuation is an appropriate approach for remediation of complex sites.
(F) Developing and demonstrating innovative methods to achieve real-time and, if practicable, in situ characterization data for tank waste and process streams that could be useful for all phases of the waste management program, including improving the accuracy and representativeness of characterization data for residual waste in tanks and ancillary equipment.
(G) Adapting existing waste treatment technologies or demonstrating new waste treatment technologies at the pilot plant scale using real wastes or realistic surrogates—
(i) to address engineering adaptations;
(ii) to ensure compliance with waste treatment standards and other applicable requirements under Federal and State law and any existing agreements or consent decrees to which the Department is a party; and
(iii) to enable successful deployment at full-scale and in support of operations.
(H) Developing and demonstrating rapid testing protocols that—
(i) are accepted by the Environmental Protection Agency, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the Department, and the scientific community;
(ii) can be used to measure long-term waste form performance under realistic disposal environments;
(iii) can determine whether a stabilized waste is suitable for disposal; and
(iv) reduce the need for extensive, time-consuming, and costly analyses on every batch of waste prior to disposal.
(I) Developing and demonstrating direct stabilization technologies to provide waste forms for disposing of elemental mercury.
(J) Developing and demonstrating innovative and effective retrieval methods for removal of waste residual materials from tanks and ancillary equipment, including mobile retrieval equipment or methods capable of immediately removing waste from leaking tanks, and connecting pipelines.
(3) Project selection
(A) Selection
The Secretary shall select projects to be carried out under the High-Impact Technology Development Program through a rigorous process that involves—
(i) transparent and open competition; and
(ii) a review process that, if practicable, is conducted in an independent manner consistent with Department guidance on selecting and funding public-private partnerships.
(B) Briefing
Not later than 120 days before the date on which the Secretary enters into the first agreement under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on the process of selecting and funding efforts within the High-Impact Technology Development Program, including with respect to the plans of the Secretary to ensure a scientifically rigorous process that minimizes potential conflicts of interest.
(c) Environmental Management University Program
(1) Establishment
The Secretary shall establish a program, to be known as the "Environmental Management University Program", to—
(A) engage faculty, post-doctoral fellows or researchers, and graduate students of institutions of higher education on subjects relating to the mission to show a clear path for students for employment within the environmental management enterprise;
(B) provide institutions of higher education and the Department access to advances in engineering and science;
(C) clearly identify to institutions of higher education the tools necessary to enter into the environmental management field professionally; and
(D) encourage current employees of the Department to pursue advanced degrees.
(2) Areas of focus
The Secretary may include as areas of focus for a grant made under the Environmental Management University Program the following:
(A) The atomic- and molecular-scale chemistries of waste processing.
(B) Contaminant immobilization in engineered and natural systems.
(C) Developing innovative materials, with an emphasis on nanomaterials or biomaterials, that could enable sequestration of challenging hazardous or radioactive constituents such as technetium and iodine.
(D) Elucidating and exploiting complex speciation and reactivity far from equilibrium.
(E) Understanding and controlling chemical and physical processes at interfaces.
(F) Harnessing physical and chemical processes to revolutionize separations.
(G) Tailoring waste forms for contaminants in harsh chemical environments.
(H) Predicting and understanding subsurface system behavior and response to perturbations.
(3) Individual research grants
In carrying out the Environmental Management University Program, the Secretary may make individual research grants to faculty, post-doctoral fellows or researchers, and graduate students of institutions of higher education for three-year research projects, with an option for an extension of one additional two-year period.
(4) Grants for interdisciplinary collaborations
In carrying out the Environmental Management University Program, the Secretary may make research grants for strategic partnerships among scientists, faculty, post-doctoral fellows or researchers, and graduate students of institutions of higher education for three-year research projects.
(5) Hiring of undergraduates
In carrying out the Environmental Management University Program, the Secretary may establish a summer internship program for undergraduates of institutions of higher education to work on projects relating to environmental management.
(6) Workshops
In carrying out the Environmental Management University Program, the Secretary may hold workshops with the Office of Environmental Management, the Office of Science, and members of academia and industry concerning environmental management challenges and solutions.
(d) Definitions
In this section:
(1) The term "complex" means all sites managed in whole or in part by the Office.
(2) The term "Department" means the Department of Energy.
(3) The term "institution of higher education" has the meaning given the term in
(4) The term "mission" means the mission of the Office.
(5) The term "National Laboratory" has the meaning given the term in
(6) The term "Office" means the Office of Environmental Management of the Department.
(7) The term "Secretary" means the Secretary of Energy, acting through the Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management.
(
§2587. Report on defense environmental cleanup expenditures
Each year, at the same time the President submits to Congress the budget for a fiscal year (pursuant to
(
Editorial Notes
Codification
Section was formerly classified to
Amendments
2013—
2003—
§2588. Public participation in planning for defense environmental cleanup
The Secretary of Energy shall consult with the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, the Attorney General, Governors and attorneys general of affected States, appropriate representatives of affected Indian tribes, and interested members of the public in any planning conducted by the Secretary for defense environmental cleanup activities at Department of Energy defense nuclear facilities.
(
Editorial Notes
Codification
Section was formerly set out as a note under
Amendments
2013—
2003—
§2589. Policy of Department of Energy regarding future defense environmental management matters
(a) Policy required
(1) Commencing not later than October 1, 2005, the Secretary of Energy shall have in effect a policy for carrying out future defense environmental management matters of the Department of Energy. The policy shall specify each officer within the Department with responsibilities for carrying out that policy and, for each such officer, the nature and extent of those responsibilities.
(2) In paragraph (1), the term "future defense environmental management matter" means any environmental cleanup project, decontamination and decommissioning project, waste management project, or related activity that arises out of the activities of the Department in carrying out programs necessary for national security and is to be commenced after November 24, 2003. However, such term does not include any such project or activity the responsibility for which has been assigned, as of November 24, 2003, to the Environmental Management program of the Department.
(b) Reflection in budget
For fiscal year 2006 and each fiscal year thereafter, the Secretary shall ensure that the budget justification materials submitted to Congress in support of the Department of Energy budget for such fiscal year (as submitted with the budget of the President under
(c) Consultation
The Secretary shall carry out this section in consultation with the Administrator for Nuclear Security and the Under Secretary of Energy for Energy, Science, and Environment.
(d) Report
The Secretary shall include with the budget justification materials submitted to Congress in support of the Department of Energy budget for fiscal year 2005 (as submitted with the budget of the President under
(
Editorial Notes
Codification
Section was enacted as part of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004, and not as part of the Atomic Energy Defense Act which comprises this chapter.
§2590. Estimation of costs of meeting defense environmental cleanup milestones required by consent orders
The Secretary of Energy shall include in the budget justification materials submitted to Congress in support of the Department of Energy budget for each fiscal year (as submitted with the budget of the President under
(1) a specification of the cost of meeting such milestones during that fiscal year; and
(2) an estimate of the cost of meeting such milestones during the four fiscal years following that fiscal year.
(
§2591. Public statement of environmental liabilities
Each year, at the same time that the Department of Energy submits its annual financial report under
(
Part B—Closure of Facilities
§2601. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–66, div. C, title XXXI, §3146(e)(10), Dec. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 1077
Section,
§2602. Reports in connection with permanent closures of Department of Energy defense nuclear facilities
(a) Training and job placement services plan
Not later than 120 days before a Department of Energy defense nuclear facility permanently ceases all production and processing operations, the Secretary of Energy shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report containing a discussion of the training and job placement services needed to enable the employees at such facility to obtain employment in the defense environmental cleanup activities at such facility. The discussion shall include the actions that should be taken by the contractor operating and managing such facility to provide retraining and job placement services to employees of such contractor.
(b) Closure report
Upon the permanent cessation of production operations at a Department of Energy defense nuclear facility, the Secretary of Energy shall submit to Congress a report containing—
(1) a complete survey of environmental problems at the facility;
(2) budget quality data indicating the cost of defense environmental cleanup activities at the facility; and
(3) a discussion of the proposed cleanup schedule.
(
Editorial Notes
Codification
Section was formerly classified to
Prior Provisions
A prior section 2611,
Amendments
2013—Subsec. (a).
Subsec. (b)(2).
2003—
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Defense Site Acceleration Completion
"(a)
"(1) does not require permanent isolation in a deep geologic repository for spent fuel or high-level radioactive waste;
"(2) has had highly radioactive radionuclides removed to the maximum extent practical; and
"(3)(A) does not exceed concentration limits for Class C low-level waste as set out in section 61.55 of title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, and will be disposed of—
"(i) in compliance with the performance objectives set out in subpart C of part 61 of title 10, Code of Federal Regulations; and
"(ii) pursuant to a State-approved closure plan or State-issued permit, authority for the approval or issuance of which is conferred on the State outside of this section; or
"(B) exceeds concentration limits for Class C low-level waste as set out in section 61.55 of title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, but will be disposed of—
"(i) in compliance with the performance objectives set out in subpart C of part 61 of title 10, Code of Federal Regulations;
"(ii) pursuant to a State-approved closure plan or State-issued permit, authority for the approval or issuance of which is conferred on the State outside of this section; and
"(iii) pursuant to plans developed by the Secretary in consultation with the Commission.
"(b)
"(2) If the Commission considers any disposal actions taken by the Department of Energy pursuant to those subparagraphs to be not in compliance with those performance objectives, the Commission shall, as soon as practicable after discovery of the noncompliant conditions, inform the Department of Energy, the covered State, and the following congressional committees:
"(A) The Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.
"(B) The Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, the Committee on Environment and Public Works, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate.
"(3) For fiscal year 2005, the Secretary shall, from amounts available for defense site acceleration completion, reimburse the Commission for all expenses, including salaries, that the Commission incurs as a result of performance under subsection (a) and this subsection for fiscal year 2005. The Department of Energy and the Commission may enter into an interagency agreement that specifies the method of reimbursement. Amounts received by the Commission for performance under subsection (a) and this subsection may be retained and used for salaries and expenses associated with those activities, notwithstanding
"(4) For fiscal years after 2005, the Commission shall include in the budget justification materials submitted to Congress in support of the Commission budget for that fiscal year (as submitted with the budget of the President under
"(c)
"(d)
"(1) The State of South Carolina.
"(2) The State of Idaho.
"(e)
"(2) Nothing in this section establishes any precedent or is binding on the State of Washington, the State of Oregon, or any other State not covered by subsection (d) for the management, storage, treatment, and disposition of radioactive and hazardous materials.
"(3) Nothing in this section amends the definition of 'transuranic waste' or regulations for repository disposal of transuranic waste pursuant to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Land Withdrawal Act [
"(4) Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect in any way the obligations of the Department of Energy to comply with section 4306A of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (
"(5) Nothing in this section amends the West Valley Demonstration Act [
"(f)
"(1) Any determination made by the Secretary or any other agency action taken by the Secretary pursuant to this section.
"(2) Any failure of the Commission to carry out its responsibilities under subsection (b)."
Sandia National Laboratories
§2603. Plan for deactivation and decommissioning of nonoperational defense nuclear facilities
(a) In general
The Secretary of Energy shall, every four years beginning in 2025, develop and subsequently carry out a plan for the activities of the Department of Energy relating to the deactivation and decommissioning of nonoperational defense nuclear facilities.
(b) Elements
The plan required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) A list of nonoperational defense nuclear facilities, prioritized for deactivation and decommissioning based on the potential to reduce risks to human health, property, or the environment and to maximize cost savings.
(2) An assessment of the life cycle costs of each nonoperational defense nuclear facility during the period beginning on the date on which the plan is submitted under subsection (d) and ending on the earlier of—
(A) the date that is 25 years after the date on which the plan is submitted; or
(B) the estimated date for deactivation and decommissioning of the facility.
(3) An estimate of the cost and time needed to deactivate and decommission each nonoperational defense nuclear facility.
(4) A schedule for when the Office of Environmental Management will accept each nonoperational defense nuclear facility for deactivation and decommissioning.
(5) An estimate of costs that could be avoided by—
(A) accelerating the cleanup of nonoperational defense nuclear facilities; or
(B) other means, such as reusing such facilities for another purpose.
(c) Plan for transfer of responsibility for certain facilities
The Secretary shall, during 2025, develop and subsequently carry out a plan under which the Administrator shall transfer, by March 31, 2029, to the Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management the responsibility for decontaminating and decommissioning facilities of the Administration that the Secretary determines are nonoperational as of September 30, 2024.
(d) Submission to Congress
Not later than March 31, 2025, and every four years thereafter,,1 the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that includes—
(1) the plan required by subsection (a);
(2) a description of the deactivation and decommissioning actions expected to be taken during the following fiscal year pursuant to the plan;
(3) in the case of the report submitted during 2025, the plan required by subsection (c); and
(4) a description of the deactivation and decommissioning actions taken at each nonoperational defense nuclear facility during the period following the date on which the previous report required by this section was submitted.
(e) Termination
The requirements of this section shall terminate after the submission to the appropriate congressional committees of the report required by subsection (d) to be submitted not later than March 31, 2033.
(f) Definitions
In this section:
(1) The term "appropriate congressional committees" means—
(A) the congressional defense committees; and
(B) the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives.
(2) The term "life cycle costs", with respect to a facility, means—
(A) the present and future costs of all resources and associated cost elements required to develop, produce, deploy, or sustain the facility; and
(B) the present and future costs to deactivate, decommission, and deconstruct the facility.
(3) The term "nonoperational defense nuclear facility" means a production facility or utilization facility (as those terms are defined in
(
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2022—Subsec. (a).
Subsec. (c).
"(1) are nonoperational as of September 30, 2015; and
"(2) meet the requirements of the Office of Environmental Management for such transfer."
Subsec. (d).
Subsec. (d)(3).
Subsec. (d)(4).
Subsec. (e).
Part C—Hanford Reservation, Washington
Editorial Notes
Codification
Prior Provisions
A prior part C, consisting of section 2611, related to privatization, prior to repeal by
§2621. Safety measures for waste tanks at Hanford Nuclear Reservation
(a) Identification and monitoring of tanks
Not later than February 3, 1991, the Secretary of Energy shall identify which single-shelled or double-shelled high-level nuclear waste tanks at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation, Richland, Washington, may have a serious potential for release of high-level waste due to uncontrolled increases in temperature or pressure. After completing such identification, the Secretary shall determine whether continuous monitoring is being carried out to detect a release or excessive temperature or pressure at each tank so identified. If such monitoring is not being carried out, as soon as practicable the Secretary shall install such monitoring, but only if a type of monitoring that does not itself increase the danger of a release can be installed.
(b) Action plans
Not later than March 5, 1991, the Secretary of Energy shall develop action plans to respond to excessive temperature or pressure or a release from any tank identified under subsection (a).
(c) Prohibition
Beginning March 5, 1991, no additional high-level nuclear waste (except for small amounts removed and returned to a tank for analysis) may be added to a tank identified under subsection (a) unless the Secretary determines that no safer alternative than adding such waste to the tank currently exists or that the tank does not pose a serious potential for release of high-level nuclear waste.
(
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2014—Subsec. (d).
2003—
Subsec. (a).
Subsec. (b).
Subsec. (c).
Subsec. (d).
§2622. Hanford waste tank cleanup program reforms
(a) Establishment of Office of River Protection
The Secretary of Energy shall establish an office at the Hanford Reservation, Richland, Washington, to be known as the "Office of River Protection" (in this section referred to as the "Office").
(b) Management and responsibilities of Office
(1) The Office shall be headed by a senior official of the Department of Energy, who shall report to the Assistant Secretary of Energy for Environmental Management.
(2) The head of the Office shall be responsible for managing all aspects of the River Protection Project, Richland, Washington, including Hanford Tank Farm operations and the Waste Treatment Plant.
(3)(A) The Assistant Secretary of Energy for Environmental Management shall delegate in writing responsibility for the management of the River Protection Project, Richland, Washington, to the head of the Office.
(B) Such delegation shall include, at a minimum, authorities for contracting, financial management, safety, and general program management that are equivalent to the authorities of managers of other operations offices of the Department of Energy.
(C) The head of the Office shall, to the maximum extent possible, coordinate all activities of the Office with the manager of the Richland Operations Office of the Department of Energy.
(c) Department responsibilities
The Secretary shall provide the head of the Office with the resources and personnel necessary to carry out the responsibilities specified in subsection (b)(2).
(d) Notification
The Assistant Secretary of Energy for Environmental Management shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives written notification detailing any changes in the roles, responsibilities, and reporting relationships that involve the Office.
(e) Termination
The Office shall terminate on September 30, 2024. The Office may be extended beyond that date if the Assistant Secretary of Energy for Environmental Management determines in writing that termination would disrupt effective management of the Hanford Tank Farm operations.
(
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2018—Subsec. (e).
2013—Subsec. (b)(2).
2011—Subsec. (b)(2).
Subsec. (d).
Subsecs. (e), (f).
2003—Subsec. (d).
2001—Subsec. (f).
"(1) The Office shall terminate 5 years after the commencement of operations under this section unless the Secretary determines that termination on that date would disrupt effective management of the Hanford Tank Farm operations.
"(2) The Secretary shall notify, in writing, the committees referred to in subsection (d) of a determination under paragraph (1)."
2000—Subsec. (b).
Subsec. (c).
Subsec. (d).
§2623. River Protection Project
The tank waste remediation system environmental project, Richland, Washington, including all programs relating to the retrieval and treatment of tank waste at the site at Hanford, Washington, under the management of the Office of River Protection, shall be known and designated as the "River Protection Project". Any reference to that project in any law, regulation, map, document, record, or other paper of the United States shall be considered to be a reference to the River Protection Project.
(
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2003—
§§2624 to 2626. Repealed. Pub. L. 117–263, div. C, title XXXI, §3132(a)(1)(B)(ii), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3060
Section 2624,
Section 2625,
Section 2626,
§2627. Notification regarding air release of radioactive or hazardous material
If the Secretary of Energy (or a designee of the Secretary) is notified of an improper release into the air of radioactive or hazardous material above applicable statutory or regulatory limits that resulted from waste generated by atomic energy defense activities at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation, Richland, Washington, the Secretary (or designee of the Secretary) shall—
(1) not later than two business days after being notified of the release, notify the congressional defense committees of the release; and
(2) not later than seven business days after being notified of the release, provide the congressional defense committees a briefing on the status of the release, including—
(A) the cause of the release, if known; and
(B) preliminary plans to address and remediate the release, including associated costs and timelines.
(
Part D—Savannah River Site, South Carolina
Editorial Notes
Codification
Prior Provisions
A prior part D, consisting of sections 2621 to 2625, was redesignated part C of this subchapter by
§2631. Accelerated schedule for isolating high-level nuclear waste at the Defense Waste Processing Facility, Savannah River Site
The Secretary of Energy shall accelerate the schedule for the isolation of high-level nuclear waste in glass canisters at the Defense Waste Processing Facility at the Savannah River Site, South Carolina, if the Secretary determines that the acceleration of such schedule—
(1) will achieve long-term cost savings to the Federal Government; and
(2) could accelerate the removal and isolation of high-level nuclear waste from long-term storage tanks at the site.
(
§2632. Multi-year plan for clean-up
The Secretary of Energy shall develop and implement a multi-year plan for the clean-up of nuclear waste at the Savannah River Site that results, or has resulted, from the following:
(1) Nuclear weapons activities carried out at the site.
(2) The processing, treating, packaging, and disposal of Department of Energy domestic and foreign spent nuclear fuel rods at the site.
(
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2003—
§2633. Continuation of processing, treatment, and disposal of legacy nuclear materials
The Secretary of Energy shall continue operations and maintain a high state of readiness at the H–canyon facility at the Savannah River Site, Aiken, South Carolina, and shall provide technical staff necessary to operate and so maintain such facility.
(
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2003—
§§2634 to 2637. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–66, div. C, title XXXI, §3146(e)(15), Dec. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 1078
Section 2634,
Section 2635,
Section 2636,
Section 2637,
§2638. Repealed. Pub. L. 117–263, div. C, title XXXI, §3132(a)(1)(B)(iii), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3060
Section,